Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Thinking Out Loud

OK, I have seen this volume pattern playout before, diminishing volume on a rally with the dominant p/v relationship as the most bearish Price Up/Volume Down. In a few instances more recently it led to a reversal to the downside. In one instance back in February of this year it kicked off a monster rally, the difference is the maturity of the top, the increased volatility that started in late April and continued through May, that wasn't present back in February. Today's candle, as the last 3 candles before it, all show diminished momentum-the gain today really came in the gap on AA earnings news, the rest of the day, we didn't see strong performance. This candle taken as is would be called an evening star which is the first of two candles in a downside reversal, the next would be a close lower which serves as confirmation, why is this different then the preceding 3 that look similar? Because of the gap, that's what makes an evening star reversal candle more powerful, although the rise in price (in the gap) makes that seem counter-intuitive, several hundred years of Japanese candlestick charting show this is a higher probability reversal. However, we already know INTC came out with good earnings and it looks (as of now) like we'll see another gap up tomorrow if after hours trade is any indication, which may setup another evening star reversal. 

What will become worrisome is a strong trading day (a wide bodied candle) like the one on July 7th. The volume picked up today and breadth was strong everywhere, but we still have to take this in context, it's largely based on retail traders bidding up the market based on AA's earnings and now INTC's. The market already knew what AA would come out with, they are privy to the whisper number so it is in fact already discounted into price.

As I suspected, AA's trading was horrible today, a high volume gap that was promptly closed and a close lower then the open. It had every chance to run off that gap, it didn't. Volume was high-which suggests churning, for all the retail buyers, there were plenty of institutional sellers. The S&P-500 gained 1.54%, AA's Beta compared to the S&P is over 2, meaning you'd expect to see a move of at least 3% in AA today-not so.

This 3C v.1 30 min chart has done an excellent job historically calling the moves in AA.


Note that the last several days (with the market) AA has been rising. At the start of July there's accumulation (pos. div) and then price confirmation. This a.m., on the gap up, 3C confirmed my analysis above, distribution right off the bat, it continued down as well. Look at the volume (click on the chart for an expanded view) on the open of this 30 min chart! So is Wall Street buying into the idea that the economy is much better and AA is leading the charge? It doesn't seem like it, they just used the earnings to make money off retail traders that still don't get two things, 1) Wall Street already knows the earnings before they are revealed most of the time. If they (institutional money) were behind AA, then there would be big accumulation and they'd use that gap up to push prices, not sell into them. 2) People don't get that earnings are in the past, they don't matter anymore, only guidance and sentiment does. Based on the intraday and end of day action today, what was the sentiment on AA?

INTC?
Something is strange with INTC today. This 4C 1 hour chart shows the selloff-negative divergence from 6/15-6/21 and the accumulation 6/30-7/2 (note: because institutional money wants to accumulate at low prices, volume tends to be low-they don't want to attract attention and be forced to pay high prices so accumulation generally ocurs on light volume). 

However, from 7/8-7/13 4C makes NO progress? That's distribution and again-look at the volume at the end of day. This is a wild guess, but could they believe that the rally won't hold long enough to liquidate their position and have started selling early and into the higher prices on INTC today? It's a possibility and one that suggests they (smart money) don't have faith in the rally? Could they know something about the next companies to report and perhaps those reports will crush the market? Or maybe something else?

Compare to the SPY 1 hour 4C chart-same thing.


And the DIA? Same thing-distribution all day.... why?


Look at 3C on the Q's past on this 1 min chart, we know it's working fine, look at the distribution into the close. Even a higher high at the close is sold off.

So what could throw a lemon in the stew tomorrow? Why does it seem that strong guidance is not being bought? 

Retail Sales are announced Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. This is a biggie! Why? It accounts for 2/3 of our GDP. Paper, rock, scissors-Retail sales trumps any guidance INTC gave. Is there a possible leak from the government? I've commented just in the last few days about how not only earnings, but Federal Reserve directives and government releases have all shown evidence of having been leaked.

Looking with a quick glance and one that left me scratching my head, I was surprised to see this kind of action in these stocks and ETFs of the averages. After hours are up because retail trader's are bidding them up based on INTC guidance, but retial traders wouldn't have access to a leaked Retail Sales report, Wall Street very well may.

OK, that's enough for tonight. I've put together a possible scenario and we'll know in several hours from now.

Here's the alternative, retail sales blow away the market, we get a monster rally. Our key level on the SPY is $113-$114-at that point we likely blow the H&S top and have to start all over. My hypothesis is just that, a hypothesis so time to talk about plan “B”. 

Considering my hypothesis I'm not throwing trades out there, I did plan to throw some longs (AMPL made good progress today, I still like it long) out, but I'm holding off on that.

If retail sales are good, not average, not pretty good, but good, then we need to look at what's in the future in earnings, but also have to take action to protect portfolios. You have to do what your risk management plan dictates, but I'm looking at selling off 30% of the inverse ETF's and adding 3x leveraged UPRO (long ETF on the SPY). If the market continues to look bullish toward the close, either at the close or Thursday that will go to 50%. It's very aggressive considering a long trap can unfold in 30 minutes and I do not like the idea one bit, it seems reactionary and emotional at that, but price is king.

If what I laid out does not come to pass, then we'll also be talking about the options on the SPY and the possibility of them being pinned as we saw last month, that might call for the market to keep up some strength until next Friday, or at least above or around the highest open interest and where the volume is flowing in the option chains.

Check in the a.m., I'll have an update after the figures come out.

While You Are Waiting

I'm still putting together the pieces and looking for the little sublte signal that will tell us something worthwhile. In the mean time, as I continue to dig through all the charts and indicators, you know that I don't listen to other analysis, especially CNBC-I don't want to color objective analysis with other's opinions.

However, there's one person I respect, Don Worden, behind the Worden Brothers products-TeleChart and StockFinder. Why Don? Don pioneered tick volume and really the use of computers and indicators back in the 1950's. He's written a huge portion of the indicators that the big boys on Wall Street used and he has more experience then almost anyone else with regard to Technical Analysis. If you read his books, you will see he doesn't look at TA like anyone else, it's culture shock to red his writings because this is a man that understands the market and the importance of thinking for yourself rather then letting the talking heads tell you. Still, I rarely read his columns as I use my own indicators and I don't want to taint my objectivity.

Today my objectivity is tainted, or was. Today was a day that struck me a bit on the emotional side, I recognize that and it means that I must work 2x as hard to be objective and check and recheck all of my analysis to make sure it is objective. Emotion creeps in, you are human, but you must recognize it and that is what I'm doing. So in a bid to set my head straight as Don shoots it as straight as they come, I read his column tonight on TeleChart's nightly Worden Report, I was encouraged that he is largely of the same opinion as I am and I'm including his comments with his indicator MoneyStream which is proprietary to Worden (it's in light blue) and my 3C indicator in orange.  Don't tell Don, but I think 3C still works better and I think the chart shows that if you look closely, but MoneyStream is powerful.

Here's the chart...

Here's my 2 cents-I like 3C better as it caught the sell off in January with a negative divergence right at the top at the end of 2009-MS didn't. While both show relative negative divergences from Oct. to the 2010 Q1 high I think 3C's is more pronounced. Both indicators are below price now which means they are in the worst divergence (negative/leading).

Now here are Don's comments tonight, be sure to check back for my analysis-(moving average is not displayed)

  " I think a 3-day chart does the best job of showing the position of the market here. For one thing we have a huge, violent plunge in MoneyStream consuming Q2 of this year, while the market price itself plunges. The market does not drop to the extent MoneyStream does, and the result is a pronounced leading divergence to the downside. TSV is also in a downside leading divergence. The price has so far fallen short of the 198-day MA, and it is now in a logical position to break to the downside and test the Q2-Q3 low. Should that low not hold, we can expect another couple of hundred points on the downside. (I used a 198-day MA, because that was as close to 200 as I could come to the 3-day MA as a multiple of the 50-day MA on the daily. Suffice it to say that 198 is close enough to 200, since 200 itself has no built-in magic.) Notice that this chart depicts the dry up in volume on the bounce. -DW"

AA

Is still looking like it may have upside. The averages for the most part are in relative negative divergences, but point to a small move up possible in the next wave. The 5-min charts are largely negative, with a few exceptions. The indicators are still a little foggy, but it certainly doesn't have a strong bullish stance. In all cases,SPY, DIA and QQQQ the afternoon retest of the highs failed as far as 3C goes as well as price. This is why we don't make major moves intraday and wait for the close.

I'll try to get one more update before the close, but right now it's looking 70% bearish. At 90% I'd call for a reversal.

CSX is foggy, but it should see upside in the next few minutes with a positive 1 min diverece