Friday, October 31, 2014

Now and Then

Just poking around through the pilings that hold up the whole pier and some things looked familiar like the sharp sell off followed by a sharp "V" shaped rally, so I took a bit of a closer look with breadth indicators. Remember, these indicators are not even as subjective as MACD or RSI, these are the pure count, the actual percentage of stocks doing a particular thing, there's no interpretation, there's nothing but objectivity.

There are certain reasons price patterns and markets behave in similar fashion, while History may not repeat, it does rhyme and that's because of human emotions, even the HFT/Algos which are programmed, turned on and off and reprogrammed by humans.

I'll keep this simple , just pay attention to the name of the indicator and where it's at. All comparisons are against the S&P-500 in red, the actual indicator is in green. The rest is pretty self explanatory.

First what time period are we looking at?
 The very top of the 2007 SPX bull market , ironically on October 12th, very close to where we are today, 10/31. The first decline was -9.43% followed by a sharp "V" shaped rally to a new high on 10/12 of +11.26% followed by another decline of -10.09%

 This is what happened after that time period, 10/12/2007 in white with a >55% decline, to put that in to context...

This was the previous bull market lows to highs over a 4+ year period, the rally actually started March 17 2003, similar to this market's start on March 9th 2009. As you can see, it took about a year and a half to tear down nearly 5 years of bull market work.


Our last sharp decline that sent sentiment so south was -7.34%, less than the initial -9.34% in 2007. The rally of the "V" bottom so far is +8.34% vs the "V" shaped rally back then in to the top of +11.26% so volatility was actually a bit greater in 2007 at least until this point. Now the indicators.

 The NASDAQ Composite's (red) Advance/Decline line in 2007 (green)

The NASDAQ Composite's A/D line now.

 McClellan Summation Index vs the SPX (red) in 2007 @ 617


McClellan Summation Index vs the SPX (red) now at -1600, much worse. 

 The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading Above Their 40-Day Moving Average in 2007, seeing a sharp drop below 20 after a negative divegrence, then on the rally breadth improved and the indicator read 73.71% as the SPX made a slight new high (SPX in red).

The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading Above Their 40-Day Moving Average NOW vs the SPX in red. Likewise we saw a sharp drop below 20% and the most recent reading as of today is +63%, 10% below the 2007 reading at virtually the same place in the move.

 The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading Above Their 200-Day Moving Average vs the SPX in 2007 with a reading on the rally of 51.40%

The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading Above Their 200-Day Moving Average vs the SPX NOW with a similar slight new SPX high and a reading virtually the same at 53.46%.

 The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading ONE Standard Deviation Above Their 40-Day Moving Average vs the SPX in 2007 with a sharper recovery to 56.58%

  The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading ONE Standard Deviation Above Their 40-Day Moving Average vs the SPX NOW at 44%

 The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading ONE Standard Deviation Above Their 200-Day Moving Average vs the SPX in 2007 at 36.7%

And  The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading ONE Standard Deviation Above Their 200-Day Moving Average vs the SPX NOW falling short at 34.96%

  The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading TWO Standard Deviations Above Their 40-Day Moving Average (momentum stocks) vs the SPX in 2007 with a recovery rally high of between 19 and 32%.

   The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading TWO Standard Deviations Above Their 40-Day Moving Average (momentum stocks) vs the SPX NOW with a recovery high of 24.83%

   The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading TWO Standard Deviations Above Their 200-Day Moving Average (momentum stocks) vs the SPX in 2007 @ 20.64% and...

   The Percentage of All NYSE Stocks Trading TWO Standard Deviations Above Their 200-Day Moving Average (momentum stocks) vs the SPX NOW at 15.64%

The similarities which are very uncommon are striking, you saw what happened to the SPX next after the pilings that hold up the pier rotted from beneath the market.

A few bonus charts...

 That HYG positive divegrence from earlier in the week I was a little concerned about and its sharp decline to negative

Today being October 31st is the day in which most MUYUAL Funds end their fiscal year and prepare their prospectus to show performance for new customers, today was the last day and it seemed that they were pushing for the best close at the close because the market traded lower from the open most of the day until the end of day when the VIX was whacked after outperforming all day, an obvious attempt to ramp the market, however HYG which would have been useful decided to keep selling off in to today's close.

 QQQ institutional timeframe of 5 min from the rally's start.

QQQ 10 min

QQQ 30 min at a leading negative divegrence and a larger relative negative divegrence

 SPY institutional timeframe of 5 min

SPY 10 min since the start of the rally

And SPY 30 min

And some interesting monthly Heiken Ashi Charts, similar to candlesticks, but better in many ways.
 SPX monthly Heiken Ashi with a much more bearish Doji (compared to candlestick charts) and note the increased volume.

 Monthly Heiken Ashi NYSE clearly breaking the multi-year trend and again on increasing volume, a bearish Hanging man

And finally, the NASDAQ Composite, all NASDAQ stocks with a very bearish Doji Star on increasing volume.

I've found that just like candlesticks, the increasing volume makes the Heiken Ashi's signal much more likely to be reliable.

Perhaps more later this weekend.

Everyone have a great weekend.






All Out Currency War and a Nation's Future at Stake

Few seem to realize what a decision the BOJ made and how many spider web cracks across the thin glass pane known as the global economy that the F_E_D has been so worried about lately, still few wonder why the F_E_D is so concerned about their part in this spider web cracking is-a-vis the $USD.

Earlier I posted some comments from an ECB insider that the F_E_D is already warning the ECB today about QE/Euro devaluation on the same day as the Bank of Japan set in motion further Yen devlauation.

For some perspective beyond the GPIF's (Japanese Pension Fund) decision to cut exposure to Jpanese bonds from 60% to 35% and selling these in to one of the thiinest major bond markets  (as noted, over the past year days have gone by without a single trade) and what's really at stake in this controversial decision and that's the right adjective, according to Saxo Bank's chief economist, " the vote was a narrow 5/4. This is extremely unusual as big decisions like these are generally only done with full consensus, but it clearly shows Abenomics is running out of time"

Via Bloomberg:

"The (Japanese) central bank is already the largest single holder of Japan’s bonds, and the scale of its buying could fuel concerns it is underwriting deficits of a nation with the heaviest debt burden. The BOJ could end up owning half of the JGB market by as early as in 2018, according to Takuji Okubo, chief economist at Japan Macro Advisors in Tokyo.

“Kuroda knows when to go ALL in,” Okubo wrote in a note. The BOJ is basically declaring that Japan will need to fix its long-term problems by 2018, or risk becoming a failed nation.

From SocGen's Albert Edwards, September 2014:

"We have felt for some time that a fragile Chinese economy could be pushed over the edge by a further yen devaluation – in many ways a replay of the Asian crisis of 1997. And just as the Chinese real economy data has taken a turn for the worse in August, the yen has slipped below a key 15-year support level against the dollar. This is probably the most important chart investors should focus on. The next phase of global currency wars may have begun.

We have written previously that Japan's QE and the associated yen weakness could trigger a re-run of the 1997 Asian crisis, only this time sucking in the Chinese renminbi. The yen has just broken below a key long-term support and after a brief technical pull-back, its decline is likely to accelerate. This will trigger a wave of profit-crushing deflation flowing from east to west


The Chinese economy will see a further rise in its already strong real exchange rate, especially if other Asian currencies are pulled down with the sliding yen. This will hurt the Chinese economy which, from August data, appears to be weakening again. The strengthening renminbi will also exacerbate deflationary pressures further.

Second, a weak yen spells trouble for the west as a wave of deflation washes in from the rapidly devaluing east. This reverses a decade long trend. I believe that profits growth is so anaemic in the west that this monetary tightening via strengthening exchange rates could in itself be sufficient to send US and European profits into outright decline and subsequently their economies into recession (via a contraction in the investment spending). 

And now...

"ECB money printing will never be able to compete with Japn. The euro might be going down v the dollar but it will be going up against the yen


(There's) Little understanding (by traders)  how, not only will eurozone be going into recession and deflation but that Germany will be the weakest economy in zone. Once Germany’s budget deficit starts to rise sharply as a result of their recession the new mad balanced budget act will kick in and they will be cutting spending aggressively. Expect the eurozone to disappear down a black hole!"


From John Hussman of Hussman Funds:

"Longer term, we continue to view present market conditions as among the most hostile in history, coupling rich valuations with market internals that remain unfavorable on historically reliable measures. So allow for any sort of action in the near term, but recognize that from a full-cycle perspective, we continue to view a 40-50% market loss as having very reasonable plausibility over the completion of this market cycle."


I'll bring you more as the governments, Central banks, Global Central banks and organizations like the G7 start chiming in on what went down today, it's clear we are just starting to understand the far reaching consequences of Abenomics, a policy that has seemed doomed since the start.

And with the Bell, Mutual Funds End their Fiscal Year

This is another crucial aspect to today's, this week's and the closing action. October 31st ids the fiscal year end for most Mutual Funds so as the bell rang a few minutes ago, they closed their books on the year.

QUICK EOD UPDATE

OTHER CHARTS WILL FOLLOW, THIS IS JUST EOD AND LIKELY OPENING MONDAY WHICH I'D THINK THEY'D WANT TO LOOK STRONG, HOWEVER THERE'S MORE TO THE STORY AFTER A 1 MIN CHART.

The SPY and DIA specifically look like they want the strongest close possible, thinking like a crook it makes perfect sense to line up limit orders for the working folk with positive market news over the weekend, however after the initial close/Monday open, things get uglier, that will follow.


 SPY 1 min

DIA 1 min

They look like they are going for the strongest close, but there are just intraday charts. If they close like this, the market should pick up Monday where it left off, I suspect that's from orders (limit) over the weekend, from there t looks to get uglier.

 IWM 1 min

QQQ 1 min don't look as enthusiastic.

I thought it might be difficult considering HYG, but I think this is a more important bigger picture ahead for next week.
 It is diverging worse and falling harder now like HY credit.

For the moment, TICK is on the side of a stronger close, but again , it's an intraday indication only. More to follow and things get surprisingly more complicated than a simple stronger close.

The Week Ahead.

I've been looking for the exact link, although I can't spend too much time, but apparently not wanting to get caught off guard  again the F_E_D is already warning the ECB (as I said earlier, I suspect the BOJ's QE decision will not be something the F_E_D welcomes as the September minutes made VERY clear the F_E_D is concerned about a strong $USD, apparently over Global Growth concerns or at least that's the party line). 

As per MNI Market News:
  • ECB SOURCE SAY EUR3 BILLION BALANCE SHEET TARGET NOT IN THE CARDS: MNI
  • ECB SOURCE FED HAS NOTICED EUR SLIDE AND ECB MUST NOT PUSH TOO FAR: MNI
You may recall at 2 p.m. Wednesday (F_O_M_C) the Euro took a swan dive exactly at 2 p.m., sending the $USD rocketing higher. The apparent implication were traders were looking to the ECB to carry on the QE torch which I have explained is no simple affair of just making the hard decision for the ECB, it will be challenged in court without the equivalent of a constitutional amendment as the ECB's charter bars them from financing any country's debt, that means no buying sovereign bonds like the F_E_D bought US Treasuries which they are even forbidden to do in the primary market so they had to use the process of POMO to buy from Primary dealers in the secondary market.

The F_E_D seems to be sending a message to the ECB not to even think about QE as the BOJ just did (well expanded it), the reason is what I suspected earlier when I said I know that from a cynical point of view, the timing looks like the F_E_D passed the baton to the BOJ, but from a realistic point of view, the Japanese pension fund is dumping Hundreds of Billions of dollars of bonds in to an illiquid market and no one else is going to buy them save for the BOJ,  that's what I believe this QE expansion was about and it causing the $USD to rise, in my view was not a welcomed development by the F_E_D.

It looks like we may be right as the ECB is responding by saying balance sheet expansion/QE is not in the cards and they were told the F_E_D noticed the Euro slide which was at 2 p.m. Wednesday on expectations the ECB will engage. So there we have it I believe, this was not a F_E_D/BOJ collusion, but a liquidity problem that would crash Japanese bonds (JGB's) when the Pension fund (GPIF) goes to sell them in to a market that has seen consecutive days without a SINGLE trade.

Thus this QE may not be as much stock market liquidity as the stock market acted like on the news, but more targeted to absorbing the GPIF's bonds that will be sold (from 60% of the GPIF's holdings to 35%-that's a lot!).

Apparently the news sent the EUR/USD higher , seemingly on "diminished QE hopes given the statements from "ECB Sources"...
There's not only a EUR/USD positive divegrence just before the story came out, but higher prices just after the divegrence.

I suspect we may hear more from the US and G7 over coming days with regard to the BOJ's overnight decision, I also suspect that the decision , as I've probably made more than clear, is an effort to keep Japanese bonds/ JGB's from absolutely crashing, thus while there is some stock specific good news for the Nikkei at least and maybe some others, it seems to me the thrust of the controversial decision (controversial in Japan and inside the BOJ as the vote was 5 to 4, as close as you get) is not what many first assumed, but a matter of need, not expansion of QE for QE's sake. The bottom line is, if I'm correct, the market will not view this as added liquidity, but simply a transfer of JGB's from the GPIF to the BOJ's balance sheet , if that's the case, it has no positive effect for stocks.

Another noted source just pointed out what we've been seeing most of the week, and certainly stronger yesterday and today, the quote was, "If this rally is so sustainable, why is everyone hedging in VIX Futures".

They don't have the benefit of 3C, it's just obvious as it was earlier in the week that the VIX is being bid due to it's stronger than usual correlation vs stocks.

 You have seen the VIX futures accumulation, the bid in VIX futures is showing up in VXX, short term VIX futures as it outperforms the SPX for the 3rd time this week (SPX prices in green are inverted so you can see what the normal correlation should look like).

As you can see, VXX, "should" have pushed lower on the SPX's push higher intraday, an apparent steady bid for protection is causing outperformance, but this is way more visible in the 60 min VIX futures.

 I didn't invert the SPX here on SPOT VIX because the difference was so glaringly large, I didn't think you needed it, just remember the VIX should be a near mirror opposite of the SPX. The red arrows point to the levels SPOT VIX "should" have moved to on the SPX intraday moves today.

As for HYG, as I said in mid October before the rally, "There's only 1 reason to accumulate HYG"  likewise, there's only 1 reason to distribute HYG. I mentioned I was concerned about the 1-2 min positive divegrence earlier in the week and speculated that the rounding top in place would see a head fake move higher forming the typical reversal pattern that looks like an Igloo with a chimney, I even drew it a day before the move higher started.

I also suspected it was a short term head fake move because HYG accumulation only went out to 2 min charts, very short term, small accumulation for a short term move.

 Here's the 2 min chart finally starting to go negative as it seems the Chimney I suspected based on nothing but concept and HYG divergences , is accomplished.

At 3 mins HYG is ugly, as I said, only out to 2 min with positive charts.

The 15 min chart shows the accumulation mid October when I said, "There's only 1 reason to accumulate HYG here), remember where we were, the Dow has just lost 1200 points over 3 weeks.

The 30 min chart doesn't even register the divegrence above, telling me it was a cycle move and as I suspected and posted numerous times before we had the first sign of a rally, "After a very strong move up which we can use to short in to, I expect a new lower low to be made below the October lows".

AS OF NOW, I STILL SUSPECT THAT TO BE THE CASE.

I often say, "Once Wall St. starts a cycle, they rarely abandon it", so if they are going to have any bullish reaction to the BOJ decision (which I'm starting to doubt more and more), it shouldn't be seen until they are at lower lows where they can accumulate on the cheap as there's NO sign anyone expected this move to be a probability,  with Goldman Sach, (A former  Japanese QE supporter).coming out and lasting the move this morning.
 
 HYG itself has been divergent , although it was perfectly in line for the majority of the mark up period.

Longer term as far as primary trends go, HYG has made nothing nut lower lows. When you see a chart like this and you know that Credit leads and stocks follow, I don't know how you can't automatically associate it with a breadth chart like this...

 The Percentage of ALL NYSE Stocks Trading ABOVE Their 40-Day Moving Average

As you can see, just like the deterioration in HY credit, EVEN WITH A FACE RIPPING RALLY...THE BREADTH INDICATOR SHOWS BARELY OVER 50% OF STOCKS ABOVE THEIR 40 DAY MOVING AVERAGE AND THAT'S AFTER A FACE RIPPING RALLY/SHORT SQUEEZE!

 Looking back further to see where we have come from, The Percentage of ALL NYSE Stocks Trading ABOVE Their 40-Day Moving Average use to trend around 88-90%, then 80% in 2013, then 76% and at record highs, just above 50%?


The Percentage of ALL NYSE Stocks Trading ABOVE Their 200-Day Moving Average shows the same deterioration.

I use to teach Dow Theory and an easy way to get an "about accurate" way of identifying trends was the 200 day as the primary and the 50 day and the intermediate. According to the chart above which is fact, more than half of ALL NYSE stocks are trading BELOW their 200-day moving average which we'd consider a bear market. Just before this move started 40% of the NASDAQ Composite was in a technical bear market and nearly 50% of the Russell 2000 was in a technical bear market with losses of more than -20%

There has been NO REPAIR HERE, this move was designed for one thing, change sentiment and shake out shorts as there were too many on the same side of the trade.

 Look at the NASDAQ COMPOSITE's Advance / Decline line, from confirmation as it moved higher to a series of lower lows, more and more NASDAQ stocks trading lower and lower

Near term, High Yield Credit has rolled over, something I've been waiting for as it confirmed the rally on the way up and just like the last bounce, we saw small inflows in to HY credit the week the rally started, now they are exiting.

 HY Credit Vs. the SPX.

And here's a broader look as HY Credit makes a series of lower lows at important ATNH's.

 As for the 30 year yield that has been leading the market, you see what happened every time the SPX and 30 year yield disagreed, the 30 year was right and stocks moved lower. The 30 year yield moved up with the rally as it should have, but has come unhinged and is leading negative worse than anything on this chart telling us what?

 Here's an intraday view, even during the rally, disagreements ended with the 30 year being correct, now it's more dislocated than ever in this rally and more than ever on a longer term basis (above).

 Pro sentiment continues to fall off and right where our rounding top was forming.

And my custom SPX/RUT ration makes no bones about it. the VIX Inversion (term structure) indicator shows buy signals, I said this is a big one and a big move is coming, but the SPX/RUT indicator seems to me the market's future is pretty well locked in, BOJ or not.

I EXPECT THE MARKET WILL FINISH THE CYCLE THEY STARTED AND FOR THE REASONS THEY STARTED IT, MEANING I EXPECT LOWER LOWS TO BE PUT IN AND I DON'T SEE THIS MARKET REACTING VERY WELL TODAY ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. VIX FUTURES TO ME ARE A DEAD GIVEAWAY THAT SOMEONE WITH VERY DEEP OCKETS IS PREPARING FOR THE NEXT PIVOT.


I'll have a near term market update out momentarily.