11:15 pm Update

I've been watching the currencies and ES, here's how things are shaping up thus far...

 ES remains in a leading negative divergence in after hours trade.

 The ES CONTEXT Model has diverged even more since 4 pm, even with ES leaking lower.

So far, although we still have a long night, this has kept US and almost all futures red across the board, notably the US and the EU.

 The EUR/USD pair, at the green arrow is the point when the market bounced late in the day, the red arrow is the close at 4 pm. Since the $USD has broken above resistance (seen here with the EUR breaking below support). There was a test of support for the $USD that passed and further gains, this should be weighing on ES Futures, but the depth of the divergence in CONTEXT is partly due to the excessive bounce in the market this afternoon up to ES's VWAP, the currency arbitrage clearly didn't support that kind of a knee jerk move.

Th $AUD with excellent correlation and a great leading indicator has also broken down below support, again the $USD rising, deepening the already deepest divergence seen between the $AUD and SPX/market.

There's a fund that a member told me about that I had forgotten about that has acted as a leading indicator for the market, I took a look tonight, it is FCT. If I could remember who sent it to me, I'd give credit where it is due.

 on this 2 day chart, FCT declined before the market in 2007, it also bottomed before the market in 2009, then it topped first in 2011 and is now negatively divergent with the SPX

 2011-present, again FCT topped before the SPX's July crash and bottomed at the end of the crash first, on a relative basis, the SPX is above the 2011 high, FCT should currently be at the green trendline, it is lagging the market again.

What brought my attention was the last 3 days of very ugly closes, all very long wicked candles, higher prices being rejected and a close today just barely off the lows.


Here are tomorrow's economic events in the US

Bank Reserve Settlement 

MBA Purchase Applications
7:00 AM ET

Challenger Job-Cut Report
7:30 AM ET

ADP Employment Report
8:15 AM ET

ISM Non-Mfg Index
10:00 AM ET

EIA Petroleum Status Report
10:30 AM ET

John Williams Speaks11:00 AM ET
 


ADP will catch some attention even though it is very noisy and often far off base, but even as the market is closed Friday, Non-Farm Payrolls will be out at 8:30 a.m. and the recent economic reports, especially in the sub-indicies have all been leaning toward a disappointing NFP print on Friday. ISM will also be an important report. 

San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank Pres. John Williams speaks to San Francisco Planning and Urban Research business breakfast. Afterward he will take questions from the audience and the media. I doubt we get anything too heavy related to QE, but who knows, both Plosser and Fisher were skeptical of more easing, it may be his turn to weigh in.

The F_E_D Effect

Earlier before the F_O_M_C minutes came out, I warned as I always do about the knee-jerk f-e-d effect and the market's seeming indecision. What I find a little surprising in retrospect is the market's volatility in both directions, apparently the two F_E_D presidents speaking last week and this week (Plosser and Fisher) both raining on the hopes of QE3 weren't enough to dampen the blow of the F_E_D minutes which did nothing for those hoping for more QE. CNBC's talking points about how the market mis-read what Bernie said pre-market last Monday were also interesting, the fact is, Bernie was ambiguous enough that he could claim plausible deniability, we addressed this that same day, but Bernie's intensions were clear, he threw out the statement and knew how the market would "choose" to interpret it, then sent out some regional presidents to let the market know they got it wrong (at least this is the facade put up for retail investors). CNBC came in to the fray today saying the market got it wrong too, but I wish I had heard CNBC on that morning just after Bernie made his speech, I wonder if they were preaching the same back then?

The late day bounce in the market had almost no correlation to anything, certainly not the dollar...

 Being UUP (intraday ETF for the dollar)  has poor volume and a spotty chart it's just as easy to look at the EUR/USD pair that accounts for 50% of the Dollar Index. You can see clearly at 2 p.m. the Euro plummet and the Dollar sky-rocket, this is market negative and stocks did roughly the same, the extent of the pullback in the dollar was quite mild compared to the intraday bounce late in the day, so the dollar wasn't the correlation, in fact the market moved against the correlation.

Here's the same comparing the Euro to the SPX, since the $USD has an inverse relationship with the market, the EUR has a correlation with the market and that correlation looked right on the way down, but certainly doesn't look right on the way back up. There simply wasn't enough of a dollar pullback to warrant the second knee-jerk reaction in stocks.

If we look at other $USD correlated assets, we didn't see the same move that we saw in equities...

 GLD is perfectly in line with the EUR which is to say that GLD is trading the way it should be trading considering what the $USD was doing.

 SLV had the same correlation

 Copper  didn't rally away from its correlation with the $USD

 Lumber didn't either

 Nor did miners

USO was a little sharper then the correlation, but nothing like stocks.

In fact looking at Credit which sold-off and wasn't interested in following the market from 2:45 on, looking at the $AUD, it wasn't interested, there was no real correlated driver for stocks' move.

So what was it?

I find this chart interesting...

This is ES (The S&P E-Mini Futures) which are a strong influence on the market, the Channel is ES's VWAP, Volume Weighted Average Price. It seems if there was any reason for the move, it can be found right here on the ES chart trying and finally succeeding in making it back to its VWAP. The VWAP is the area in which institutional selling would occur (it's used as a measure to see how well a market market or specialist fills an institutional order). This is the only real correlation that explains the move, a flight/fight to get back to ES's VWAP and note both times ES was near or at VWAP, the trade size picked up/volume.

As for ES's implied value...

ES is clearly very extended away from the implied fair value of the CONTEXT model, this is what you'd consider a rather large divergence in ES and again it seems like it pretty much has everything to do with making it back to the VWAP.

These knee jerk movements often seem without reason, the financial media will always have some reason why the market did what it did (again for retail consumption), but after looking at all the correlations VWAP is the clear winner. Now what actually happened as the trade size and volume picked up at VWAP, well after a big parabolic move down like that, I'll let you decide why the smart money players, market makers and specialists out there might want to get back to VWAP.

As for the $AUD which has been doing a great job on an intraday basis as a leading indicator...

Every time the SPX is moving up and the $AUD is moving down, there's a divergence that takes the market lower. If you compare the first peak in the $AUD and SPX to the second (middle) peak in both, there's a relative negative divergence there as the SPX is higher and the $AUD is lower compared to the first peak, that middle peak was a much sharper sell-off then the first which stair-stepped down. Now look at the first peak in $AUD/SPX compared to this week's, that's a significantly larger divergence and one of the reasons I said "I wouldn't be long anything in this market right now". If the 1.7% pullback in the Dow can put a month of longs underwater, what would happen on a real crack, especially considering the market is much more lateral then it was back then?

Example:

The pullback is to the far right of the red rectangle and the market was trending up, any trade in or above that red triangle would be at a loss on a -1.7% move.

That same -1.7% move from today's close would look like this...

It would take out just over 3 weeks of longs, however, the difference now is we are not trending up, we are trending sideways and volatility is not low like it was through the entire move up, it's higher (both characteristics of a top). With al of the indicators from Credit to rates, to currencies and more going negative in the March area, I don't think it's a coincidence the market has chopped sideways in fairly large swings.

There are so many different ways to represent volatility, for me the easiest is just to eyeball the chart, but here's a more scientific approach. Bollinger Bands won't due as they are based on the standard deviation of closing prices over a set period of time. This is a Volatility Channel that uses the daily range instead and thus is a better indication of volatility.

In February the channel had about 1.9% of volatility, now it's at nearly 3%, in fact the upped band is off the chart. This is about a 52% change in volatility (1.9*1.52=2.88). At the pullback I mentioned, the volatility range was even less, only 1.7%. However lets just use the figures above as an example.

If we were to consider the same pullback (and that was just  pullback) at today's volatility, this is what it would look like on the Dow-30

Instead of taking out 3 weeks of longs, it would put everything in or above the rectangle at a loss. It's a pretty well known fact that fear is stronger then greed and markets fall a lot faster then they rise.

Case in point...

It took 5 years for the S&P to complete its bull market and less then 18 months to tear it all down and then some.


Here's ES since the close...

3C is at new leading lows for the day and quite a bit longer actually.

As for internals, the action today was on higher than avg. volume (NYSE 817 mln, vs. 805 mln avg; Nasdaq 1750 mln, vs. 1710 mln avg) with decliners outpacing advancers (NYSE 1048/1957 Nasdaq 759/1779).


The larger then average size volume should be noted came on the post minutes decline.

The ratio between advancers/decliners wasn't too extreme to indicate a 1 day oversold event. However the Dominant Price/Volume relationship was closer to a 1-day oversold event in the Dow with a dominance in Close Down/Volume Up-over half the stocks. However this may be offset by the P/V in the R2K Which indicates the market is not in a 1 day oversold condition with Close Down/Volume Down (this is also the most common relationship during a bear market decline). The NASDAQ and SPX weren't dominant.

 Dow-30

 NASDAQ 100

 R2K

SPX
It should also be noted that the bounce in the European market seems to have ended, last week as the European markets declined to support, I expected a bounce there, this is strictly technical as the fundamental situation there is deteriorating fast.

In addition, the European Top 100 Index has not only closed below the 50 day moving average, but the X-Over Custom Crossover screen is showing a sell/sell short signal as the 10 day crosses below the 22 and the custom indicator crossed below its moving average and RSI is moving below the Zero line.

I should also mention the EU 100 rallied about the same as the SPX, (SPX +22.5% since 11/25 and the EU 100 +21.5%)

So to summarize, the knee jerk reaction and volatility is quite common after anything F_E_D related. The most likely reason for the rally at the end of the day had nothing to do with any correlations (algo arbitrage) and looked a whole lot more like a run for ES's VWAP. I wouldn't think the larger trade size at the VWAP would have been buying as the average trade size during the move up in ES was smaller.

Most of the Averages close at resistance

I'm using the DIA as an example, but most were in this area except the IWM which as pointed out earlier, looked to be the weakest of the bunch. It certainly closed the weakest of the bunch. Now to watch ES and currencies. Pretty typical F_E_D volatility.

Market Update

 ES is showing a positive divergence as we come up on multiple support levels, however I don't think any bounce at this point is going to hold long.

 As mentioned, the longer term damage is done, the market's are in an area I wouldn't dare be long at this point.

 CONTEXT for ES is way , way below where ES is trading, implying a fair value much lower.


 Relative to the SPX, commodities are holding up better, but I'm not sure where, the PM's Copper and Oil are all down significantly.

 There's a longer term negative divergence in commodities between the two recent bounces, longer term it is even worse.

 $AUD has hit new regional lows, this is a major drag on any market attempt to bounce.

 Longer term, $AUD is near the lows of January, this is why I wouldn't be long anything right now, the market could crack at any moment and a 1.7% decline last time put a month of longs at a loss, this will be a lot worse.

 The Dollar has jumped here, the bounce in the SPX is going against that correlation, so I think this is just the volatility I talked about before. There's no correlation for the market to bounce and with the dollar up like this, it shouldn't be able to hold long.

Sector rotation since last Friday, clearly defensive sectors are coming in to play, Financials is rolling out as is energy, Industrials, Tech looks to be topping.

Keep an eye on AMZN

 Confirmation of the head fake is below 196.50


 There may be some intraday support in the white area, it might be useful to short in to.

Since filling the gap this am, the 1 min chart is leading negative.