Thursday, May 2, 2013

Daily Red-Flag Wrap

Some of these charts may look a bit different right now (mostly futures/currencies)  because I started capturing them at 4 p.m. at the close, I was hoping to get this post done by 5 p.m. before I'm suppose to talk to my wife, but no where even close so the point is, what they looked like that was a red flag, if there are any significant changes that will be updated later.

THERE'S A LOT OF VOLATILITY ALL AROUND AS PROMISED. The SPX closed up 0+94%, which is the best performance since last Tuesday's +1.04%. Something I mentioned with "Increased Volatility" was that we'd not only see volatility in terms of  percentage moves, but to expect volatility to be expressed in direction also (as well as ATR) and today's performance was almost the mirror opposite of yesterday's, (Up +0.94% vs Down -0.93%!). I had also mentioned this volatility could just create huge chop zones rather than trends, take the SPX's open yesterday at 1597.55, today's close was 1597.61, that's a difference between yesterday's open and today's close of 6 cents or 0.00003%! It's almost like one big day rather than two that closed right where it opened, that's the kind of volatility I was talking about at this stage of the game!

I guess I should make the boiler plate statement that the SPX closed at all time new highs today, despite the fact that a 0.25% move or at this point even a 0.001% move can garner that same badge of honor.

Continuing along the volatility lines...
Despite negative divergences, this is one of the charts that bothered me... HYG, which is used to manipulate the SPY higher intraday through arbitrage correlations, was nearly diagonal intraday with its 2nd biggest 1-day gain of the year coming in at +0.65% which was just a bit weaker than yesterday's weakness with yesterday's biggest 1-day loss of the year at -0.68% which similar to the SPX situation mentioned above (yesterday's open vs today's close) put HYG just a hair shy of where it closed on Tuesday, for example...

Do you see it? Volatility is huge the last two days with the biggest 1-day loss of the year yesterday and the 2nd biggest 1 day gain of the year today, yet we are still -0.03 lower than Tuesday, in other words, exactly what I was trying to describe, extreme daily percentage moves and extreme unpredictability and choppiness,  the end result is a lot of movement, but a flat trend (which is fine, we can trade that and make good money as we have, you just don't want to be left without a seat when the music stops, thus my being extra careful.

Treasuries were interesting as well... As HYG expressed a risk on posture helping the market today, at the same time TLT or, "The Flight to Safety" trade was doing its own thing.

Remember that the typical correlation is money bounces back and forth between safety (Treasuries) and risk (stocks) so TLT vs. the SPX as seen above, typically has an almost mirror opposite correlation, but today even though the market was headed higher, TLT which one would expect to move lower was just 0.11% shy of yesterday's close and had been trending higher all day since the gap down open. So while HYG is representing a "Risk On" sentiment, TLT is representing a "Flight to Safety" mood and both on the same day, Talk about Volatility! Of course both are assets used to manipulate the SPY's pricing.

We can get an overview of intraday manipulation efforts from the SPY Arbitrage, (you'd probably find some interesting things by putting a Percent Change or Rate of Change type indicator on TLT, VXX and HYG as well as the SPX and compare it to the SPY Arbitrage model.

I can tell you for sure that part of the upside manipulation "Bang the Open" came directly from Treasuries (TLT's) open with the gap down, TLT's move from 12 to 1 would have been supportive of the market, TLT's move from 1 to 2 pm would have not helped the market and the Arbitrage is fading at the same time and TLT's slight downside over-reaction at the EOD would have been supportive as you can see on the SPY Arb. chart at the close.

VXX's gap down would have provided more positive effect on the open, speaking of which...

To the left is the gap down open in VXX is the one that would have supported the green opening in the SPY arb.., the failure of VIX futures to make a new low at "A" would not have been helpful and at "B" the slight over-reaction to the downside would have been helpful.

All in all though, putting a little perspective in to things...
The close in VXX yesterday at "B" compared to where the SPX closed yesterday compared to the VXX close at A last Friday compared to an even lower price in the SPX, demonstrates yesterday's bid for protection near the end of the day in VIX futures, some of that was obviously unwound today. You also get a little better feel for the inverse or opposite correlation between the two assets, but all in all, as the SPX trends higher, we are not seeing the complacency normally seen, but rather more fear as protection is bid in the VIX futures. Once again, while not as volatile today with a -3.39% decline vs. yesterday's +4.22% gain, today's close was nearly exactly the same as yesterday's open ($19.10 vs. $19.14 respectively)-this is that volatility without a trend which is daily or day to day volatility I was talking about.

Risk sentiment as measured by our two assets that don't have a manipulative correlation with the market are showing the type of divergence I'm looking for in Leading Indicators to tell us when we are nearing the end and should be backing up the truck and loading it with positions (shorts)...
 HIO has been risk off since the 29th which is understandable with the SPX's trend, except today it was clearly risk off which is the divergence I'm looking for, although FCT shows more of what I'd like to see.

FCT is the second sentiment indicator, today FCT was rather flat and stuck close to yesterday's close (faint light blue trendline) , but the overall recent divergence has been much clearer, there's a clear risk off sentiment here and thus we have the larger divergence that I'm looking for.

High Yield Credit (different than HYG), showed us something not only interesting, but telling yesterday, one of the reasons I went for the IWM and GOOG calls late day...
 This is yesterday's action in High Yield Credit (a risk asset) vs. the SPX (green as always), not only did HY Credit not drop with the SPX all day, the last two hours it made higher highs while the SPX was making lower lows, this is why we call these "Leading Indicators". the SPX followed HY Credit's lead today, although HY Credit told us the day before.

 Today HY Credit stuck near yesterday's closing high most of the day, this wasn't exactly negative, it was more reversion to the mean. Had HY credit dropped today with the SPX heading higher, I'd have a greater sense of urgency with regard to positions. Since HY Credit is less liquid than HYG, it tends to move first as bigger positions take more time to get out of.

Here's the overall near term trade, basically a reversion to the mean, I'll be watching for credit to dislocate or negatively diverge from the SPX.

Back to Treasury related, Yields which are like a magnet for stock prices, but do lead...
 Over the last several days, Yields have been heading lower, they should move roughly in line with the SPX, lower yields tend to attract stock prices the same direction so an obvious negative divergence exists here, however it didn't grow much worse intraday, you can see it closed today just below yesterday forming a daily candle that is a perfect Doji Star, normally this would be an upside reversal signal, if so, that would imply the market has some more upside to go which is what I was concerned about today and why I waited on any new short positions even though we had excellent signals. However, remember that 3C is showing us what's going on, it's telling us with negative divergences today that today's price strength is being sold or shorted in to, that by itself doesn't mean an imminent reversal is at had, there are many pieces of the puzzle we must assemble, hence the name "3C". a reminder to "Compare, Compare, Compare".

Looking at the last month or so of trade, we have one of the CLEAR negative divergences vs the SPX that I'm looking for on a more consistent and deeper basis in all Leading Indicators. The recent action in yellow in the SPX has been more or less range bound while Yields make lower lows. SPX prices are higher today at point "B" than point "A", however yields are significantly lower. There's typically a reversion to the mean, both short term and longer term.  Speaking of longer term...

Since the November 16th rally cycle started Yields were in line with the SPX until they stopped making higher highs early in 2013 when we had the massive economic data manipulation known as "Seasonal Adjustments", then around the same time the SPX tripped a stop on my Trend Channel, signaling a significant change of character had come in to play. Yields have fallen lower and lower as the pundits on TV got the "Great 2013 Rotation Out of Bonds and In to Stocks"totally wrong, as usual (this is why I don't watch CNBC) actually the flow went the opposite way.

As for some currency deviations from the trend...
 The $AUD which had recently taken over for the Euro as the currency that tracked the SPX went completely negative today, these are risk off signals, but I would like to see a series of at least several days of this kind of divergence.

The Euro didn't follow the SPX higher on the rallies in yellow, but did follow the general trend, however the Euro too (which should follow the market generally) lost significant ground vs the SPX today. As far as the negative divergences in the market today, had the intraday action worsened significantly, that would have been a part of my analysis leaning toward shorts, but pother than the open, intraday there wasn't much negative diverging.

 The Euro since the November 16th lows (which were a decline that started on September 14th, the day after the F_O_M_C announced QE-3, we got a day and a half of upside knee-jerk reaction followed by a downward drift and then a decline of around -8% to the 11/16 lows). Note the significant dislocation vs the SPX.

The $USD today vs the SPX, it seems that the afternoon action in the $USD either held back or helped the SPX, but roughly kept it in place.

The longer term trend, in yellow the normal correlation of $USD up/market down is ignored by the market, in green you can see what the normal correlation looks like, there's more but I didn't want to clutter the chart. In white the $USD is pulling back from a much larger base which has allowed the SPX some upside breathing room, strangely the SPX hasn't done much with the room and I believe the $USD is about to reverse to the upside and start a significant uptrend, very market negative.

Here's the bigger picture, in white I trace out the large "W" bottom in the $USD, if the F_E_D normalizes policy as they have been hinting at, all of the $USD destruction from printing will have to be unwound and higher interest rates will prevail, along with other countries still debasing their currencies, this could send the $USD on a once in a quarter Century move to the upside which would be absolutely destructive to any risk asset from Credit to commodities to (probably most significantly) stocks. This would also make sense with the longer term Primary trend in gold which seems to have entered a bear market.

 The Japanese Yen and it's correlation as a Carry Trade currency since the 11/16/2012 market bottom, notice where there have been consolidations in the Yen, it has effected the market. If you read my 2 part article, "A Currency Crisis", you know that I suspect the Yen is about to move significantly higher, this would effect the market negatively as the carry trade (or what's left of it) would have to be unwound, first by selling assets bought with the proceeds and then selling the second currency and buying back the first (even more demand on the Yen would send it higher). With some institutions using 200:1 leverage on the Carry, even small market losses could trigger a downside avalanche and you'll notice the Yen has become more correlated to the market, or actually the market is paying more attention to the Yen.

Who would have thought?

 The Yen seemingly not well correlated to the SPX to the left, but recently more correlated, you can see this on a larger scale.

Look at today's intraday action, the Yen moves higher (market negative and carry trade negative) and all of the sudden the market stops and doesn't make a single higher high. The lows in the Yen intraday nearly correspond with the highs in the SPX and we have seen this several times before recently.

Other Assets...
 AUD 1 min seems to have moved down from an intraday negative, then a slight positive appears, this was a red flag., in fact it was as the AUD is now higher than any point today right now.

 AUD 5 min the 5 min suggests a move to the upside is coming and significant, I'd expect this has to do with the market too, perhaps the SPX $1600, you probably recall the last post and my comments about the emotional changes moves like this bounce are meant to cause and why.

 AUD 15 min has the same positive divergence so I expect some market upside still, meaning today probably was not the best time to add/enter short positions.

AUD 30 Some recent bad economic news from Australia has changed the outlook for the currency. Previously any longer timeframes offer no clues as the RBA was seen as sitting on the fence as to further cuts this year until they saw the economic outlook. Now they have seen it, I suspect there's an expectation the RBA will be much more dovish, perhaps even cutting at the next meeting by 50 basis points. I expect that is why the AUD has been quite a bit more negative lately and I expect it to continue unless economic data gets better.


 EUR 1 min looked like it would shoot up earlier today with a positive divergence, that would likely send the market higher, as the day went on that divergence faded, but I suspect the accumulated positions are still there and the move will come at some point to dump them.

 EUR 5 min shows something similar to a bear flag. If so, I'd expect a head fake breakout to the upside before more downside, that fits with out market model of a move up. negative divergences increasing and that being the area to load up the truck.

 EUR 15 min also suggests that head fake move to the upside from a bear flag-type price pattern.

EUR 30 min, ultimately I think downside prevails, this would negatively effect the market.


 $USDX 1 min was negative earlier, suggesting the market would benefit from a fall in the $USD, that divergence changed a bit too, going slightly negative, another small red flag. Currently the $USD is making a small move lower, if it continues then we will be on track with the original divergence which I suspect is still effective.

$USDX 5 min in line

$USDX 4 Hour this is the right side of the "W" base in the $USD, the negative divergence is the current pullback in the $USD and the building positive divergence is the reversal of the pullback and a move to possibly a primary uptrend in the dollar, this would be very market negative.


$USDX 30 min I show the faster 30 min just to verify that the positive divergence to end the $USD pullback is actually there and building, if this coincides with a market decline, it will be like the perfect storm, especially if the Yen moves up as I suspect it will.

 Yen 1 min is a sort of bear flag/pennant with a slight positive 3C lean, currently this pattern continues, it should lead to a highly directional move.

Yen 5 min as for the direction of that move, the 5 min chart suggests it is up, this is a market negative, but who knows when it fires.

Yen 30 min I suspect sees that move up, a bigger move down and then a primary trend re-assert itself on an upside move. Why?


Yen 4 Hour the long term chart says so

 ES 5 min with a quite negative divergence in place, I'm not sure if this is a pause or volatility day to day or building out the final divergence.

ES 1 min intraday is not nearly as negative as some of the averages.

NQ 5 min again another negative divergence, but which timeframe? It's possible a 1 min could knock the futures down tonight and this is tomorrows divergence or possible that we keep seeing increasingly bigger divergences in to higher prices. We are not prisoners to this mystery, there are other indications that will help the pieces fall in to place.


TF (Russell 2000 Futures) 1 min are oddly more positive intraday than one might thoink given some of the negatives in the averages today.

TF 1 min is showing a HUGE leading negative divergence, if I was just looking at this, I'd bet everything on red that the R2K is significantly lower tomorrow and it may be, but that doesn't mean that today would have been the ideal area to enter shorts, Monday could possibly be up even higher and that may be the area to add shorts, there were just too many red flags today, each small and meaningless on its own, but taken together, they form a warning.

Strangely a TF 5 min positive divergence, again this suggests that today probably was not the right day to enter significant short or Put options. Timing is everything with options as we saw with our GOOG and IWM calls today.

Right now the market is seeing generally worse 1 min negative divergences and we have seen some downdraft from some of them, it's still unclear as to what they mean at this point and until we are clear like we have been, I encourage patience and not giving in to the emotion of greed, that you'll miss the move. There's always another opportunity.



I Didn't Take the Afternoon Off

In fact when I'm quiet during market hours, it's because I'm studying something very carefully.

Looking at the charts today I'd have to say 99 out of 100 times I would have gone short with full confidence, today something struck me as strange and as I often tell you, I'd rather miss the trade than take a trade that could go very wrong when I knew there was a red flag.

I've explained many times that there's a difference between probability and high probability.

Here's an example, a long time member (years) who was always the nicest guy in the world asked me about HL, not as a trade, but as a potential turn around play. I looked at it, told him it had just made a new low and there are some shorter term positives in place, but to support something bigger it was going to need to do more work, more basing, the indicators were going to have to improve before it was a turn around play.

Well here's the chart...
The day in yellow is the day he asked me about it, the next couple days it didn't do anything and then it moved at the same time we had strong positive divergences in GLD and SLV and bought at the low of the day and sold at the high of the day 4 days later, so the silver miner moved with it. He emailed me upset that it was up in his words, "20%", if you bought at the lowest low and sold at the highest high it would have been 17%, if you bought at the close the day he asked and sold at the exact top on the close it was a 10% gain, we had just made 88% in 4 days on GLD and SLV calls (bought at the low and sold at the high), with one of the days we were holding being the biggest 1-day gain for both GLD and SLV in 7 months, but that was a trade, we knew when to get out, it wasn't a turn around position. So shortly after I received the email that he should have listened to himself, which I agree with, you always need to listen to yourself and make the decision, he cancelled his multi-year membership.

Then HL went down the next day and over the next several days was down 23% counting close to close and 28% counting the perfect entry and exit and as you can see, HL just saw a typical countertrend bounce, it wasn't at a base/bottom. In any case, yes there were short term signals everywhere in precious metals including HL and the probabilities obviously were HL would bounce with the PM complex, but it was no where near a trend reversal.

I guess you could say the probabilities were it would bounce, but as a turn around trade, it was no where near a high probability trade.

Today was a REALLY hard day for me to make that call, there were so many things that looked really good for a short position or puts and maybe tomorrow some of these things resolve, but as far as what I can observe today, I thought the probabilities are on the side of lower prices, but being a special trade, a high probability trade, something was missing.

Again, if a stock is in the middle of a move down and I'm looking at it, I can say, "I think the probabilities are that this stock continues down for maybe another 10%, that may sound like a good position, but here's the difference between the probabilities of another 10% down and a high probability trade, it's not even in the percentage move (because if the signals are strong enough we have tools like leveraged ETFs or options to make it worthwhile).

A "High Probability Trade" is one where the risk is low, the chances it does what we expect are very high and the timing is good. A stock that has run up and is exhausted with tons of negative divergences in a general market atmosphere that is similar (a market that has made an exhaustive run with tons of negative divergences so it supports the trade instead of works against it) and a trade that has come to us instead of one we are chasing on the way down (as a bounce is much more likely when you are chasing) and a trade that we have watched and expected to do "A, B and C" and it does all of those things to put itself in a "High Probability" position is the kind of trade I'm looking for, not jus tone that probably has some more downside, one that is far away from a natural stop, one that is out of sync with the market, etc. So there's a big difference.

Today the differences were more subtle, but there were red flags. I mentioned earlier that it took me all of maybe 30 seconds to decide the IWM and GOOG were great call candidates yesterday and we made +53 and +73% for less than a half day of market risk, we even got out at the height of market momentum before the gains started to fade off. That was a high probability trade. After years of watching these charts, you can just see the ones that are screaming "TRADE ME" and the ones that look good, but something's not quite there.

There was an old demon at work too...

A while back I had a full AAPL short position and I closed it because everything suggested that AAPL moves higher, so I take the profits and then re-enter at a better price and ride it lower. Unfortunately as I mentioned the last few days, when we get to where we are in the market, not only volatility increases, but the predictability goes way down. All it took was Dan Loeb's Third Point Fund with AAPL as a top holding the prior week and missing from that list the current week and every hedge fund tried to exit the same door at once and the result was AAPL was nearly cut in half, down over 300 points and I missed that.  So these type of things are what haunt us as traders, if I had the same fear today that I'd miss the trade, I'd let the l;little red flags slide and even though it looked great (the market short), it wasn't screaming like GOOG and IWM calls were yesterday or closing all the Market Puts yesterday. 

Sometimes we don't even recognize what the past trauma was that keeps sabotaging our trading, this is why I'm a huge advocate of a trade journal, but not at all like you are probably thinking. I've described it for many of you and the process, it's not about writing down what trades you took, where and what indicators told you, it's much more powerful than that and I'll be sure to post it soon because YOU become your own teacher and find trading habits and techniques that may be great, but there's one that fits you best. I digress... The point is, the fear of missing the trade from that AAPL trade was certainly there, but as I said, I had to learn that I'd rather miss the trade (because there will be another one right behind it) than take one I see as subpar or has something I don't understand.

Well enough of the motor mouth, I'm late to talk to my wife on Skype (5 pm) so I'll post these charts as soon as I finish  talking with her and see how her treatment is going, but I have been here the entire time looking at so many charts my fingers hurt and I type all day, every day so you can imagine.





IOC Short Candidate Moving Our Way

Many of us already have a profitable short position in IOC, this is a core, long term short. For those who may want a primary trend short position and want some exposure to the Energy Industry Group, IOC has insane profit potential as you can see by my last update which is linked below.

In my last update, IOC Short Set-up on April 28th I explained the trade idea, the short set up, how IOC should behave, what it needed to do to "Come to us" and make it a high probability/low risk short with enormous profit potential.

Please read the last update because EVERYTHING we expected and wanted to see since that update, has happened. We are VERY close to a tactical entry.

If you understand the linked post above, explaining what to look for, then all you need are these few charts to see how well the trade idea is actually shaping up.

 This is the main feature, a Head and Shoulders top, best seen on a 5 day chart so the preceding trend is seen as well. The price pattern was verified by me using the only method other than 3C known to verify a true H&S top which is the lost art of volume analysis.

There are 3 places to short a H&S top that are lower risk/higher probability. The best (if you have patience) is at the top of the head, that's the lowest risk, the maximum profit potential, but can take some time so you must ALWAYS consider Opportunity Cost", in essence, can you make more money somewhere else over that time period and if you have the time and skills to do such.

The second area is at the top of the right shoulder, which is where we are now.

Finally, the last spot... After that most technical traders will short IOC as it breaks below the H&S neckline-the red trendline, this is Technical Analysis' favorite area other than a break below and a failed test of the neckline (now resistance). However Wall St. knows all of this and uses it against traders, they enter short on the break below and add on what appears to be a failed test of resistance and then Wall St. pulls what I call a "Volatility shakeout" and they run price ABOVE the red trendline where most traders have placed their short (buy to cover) stops. It is this shakeout and eventual head fake move that is the last good spot to short a H&S top, just when all the initial shorts are covering their short.

 In the right shoulder we have an ascending triangle, being that most traders don't look at the big picture, they see this bullish consolidation/continuation pattern as a typiccal consolidation after a run to the upside which happened starting December of 2012, traders expect this to breakout to the upside and they will buy that breakout, especially if they haven't looked at a longer term chart and identified the H&S top present.

The first move in this "Crazy Ivan" shakeout is naturally below support of the triangle, making traders think it failed, the second move is to shakeout the other-side at #2 with an expected breakout in the direction expected, continuing the December Rally's uptrend as that is what this price formation has represented for over a century. Traders buying this breakout are the target as we want to sell short to them, they are in essence buying the shares we are selling short and smart money as well because they need something that creates demand to absorb the large positions they put on. When the pattern breaks down from the left shoulder. the losses from the retail longs who bought the breakout will fuel selling and that will create more downside momentum so the neckline is easily broken. Retail buyers are there to provide demand for large short positions and to create downside momentum as they reluctantly take their losses.

 The 3C chart verifies the set up in the ascending (bullish) triangle, there's a 3C negative divergence creating the first shakeout below the triangle and then there's accumulation (white) there sending IOC up and above the breakout of the top of the triangle. The leading negative divergence just confirms smart money has been selling/shorting in to price strength and demand- this is the purpose of all of this and 3C makes it crystal clear as it happens.

Now looking at a VERY short term 1 min chart, it suggests IOC will make a run higher or at least starts to suggest that. We need the longer charts to go positive as well, maybe out to 5 mins or so and then we get a higher high that creates more retail buying and that is where we are looking for stronger distribution to sell short for ourselves, the trade has come to us on our terms, it is low risk, it has high profit potential and the timing is excellent, a "High Probability/Lower Risk Trade".

Like a Wolf Pack, we have been stalking IOC.

 The same 1 min chart shows the first breakout was nothing but distribution (institutional selling) in to higher prices, the current positive divergence is to send IOC to a new high, this is another small clue about the overall market.

This is the Bull Trap, the ascending trianglee that is within the H&S top's  right shoulder and a move to a higher high here is our trade, the yellow drawings show where I expect the head fake move-again telling us something about the broad market.

Today's candlestick w/ yesterday's creates a star reversal candlestick pair, we just so happen to need an upside reversal to short in to. The higher volume today makes the candlestick reversal much more reliable.

Patience and keep this one on your radar!