Thursday, June 26, 2014

Daily Wrap

I'll keep it short tonight, but VERY on point with one of the most important charts of the last week, perhaps of the year, perhaps even longer.

I think the event of the day, perhaps even the event of the year (although contrasting it with last week's F_O_M_C and Yellen's press conference is difficult to reconcile), must be this morning's rebuke of the market by a normally "Dovish" James Bullard, the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Some bullet points from Bullard this morning...

  • BULLARD SAYS MARKETS DON'T APPRECIATE HOW CLOSE FED IS TO GOALS
  • BULLARD SAYS HE'S TRYING TO PUT EMPHASIS ON CLOSENESS TO GOALS
  • BULLARD: MARKETS SHOULD BE PRICING IN RATE INCREASES BASED ON WHAT THE FED SAYS
  •  BULLARD: ECONOMY SHOULD BE ABLE TO HANDLE IT IF WE BEGIN TO PULL BACK FROM WHERE MONETARY POLICY IS NOW

A President of a Federal Res. Bank who is known for leaning on the "Dovish / accommodative side", doesn't likely go out and flat out tell the market that it's wrong without the ok of higher ups and there's only one higher up and she's a she. One has to wonder why send out a dove to bring news like this? You'd normally expect this to come from one of the hawks, my guess is "credibility" as a moderate dove.

Bullard told Fox Business news, 


Fed Could Hike Rates in 1Q 2015

And guess why?

"Inflation is moving in the right direction toward the central bank’s 2% target, St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said Thursday, perhaps prompting an interest rate hike as early the first quarter of 2015.

When that happens, it will require a delicate balancing act by the central bank to keep inflation in check, using rising interest rates to keep prices stable, Bullard said in an exclusive interview with FOX Business Network's Maria Bartiromo on Opening Bell."

This is exactly what I have been saying, the one thing that would FORCE the F_E_D's hand, INFLATION which is not noise, it's a trend.

Earlier today I emphasized that although we want the best entries and exits and watching intraday trade often gives us that, we don't want to get lost in the lines, miss the forest for the trees and that's why I put up this post showing where we really are in predictive price patterns...The Bigger Picture

In that spirit, as we have seen the F_O_M_C knee jerk reaction come and go, there's only 1 chart I feel is VERY important to share with you tonight, that would be the following...
This is the SPX (red/green) vs. 10-year Yields (white) since the F_O_M_C. Remember how many times over the last week I said the rather benign policy statement seems to have kick-started fear with smart money? We've seen it every day whether moves in VIX, moves in 3C, relative strength in Defensive S&P sectors such as Utilities (see last night's EOD post), moves in inflationary hedge assets such as Gold and Silver.

If you look at the chart above showing the direction of 10 year yields since the F_O_M_C on the 18th, all you need to understand how significant this chart is and what it means to the market is this post from a week ago, 10-Year Yield (Bemchmark) vs. the Market

Look specifically at the charts comparing 2007, 2009, 2011 and right now and then take one more look at the trend in 10-year rates above since the F_O_M_C and CPI released just before, it should be resoundingly clear, especially in light of posts like today's The Bigger Picture.


SCTY Update , History and Market Dynamics as a Proxy

If you just want to see the current SCTY charts, skip down toward the bottom of the post, but I think there are some very interesting things we can take away from the recent history, our trades, posts, analysis, etc over the last month or so. In that case, this post serves in a way as a broad market update while also covering SCTY.

SCTY was first featured here as a "Momentum Stocks" hitch-hiking LONG trade on May 16th, Momentum Stocks. The other stocks featured and the resulting gains since the "Hitch-hiking" long trade of momentum stocks from May 16th include: FB +16%, AMZN +12.6%, PCLN +13.6% and SCTY +41%.

The chart provided for SCTY was the following with the following comments from May 16th (in red).
"SCTY I looked at pretty closely today and it too would be a candidate.

I'll likely go through my momo watchlist and pull some other names out that may be interesting,  however don't forget that these are for short duration, "Hitch-hiking" (meaning to follow the market or draft it) trades."

It turns out SCTY was bouncing from the neckline of what looks like a pretty well formed H&S top, to create the right shoulder; that's why the trade ideas all came with the caveat at the end of the post, "however don't forget that these are for short duration, "Hitch-hiking" (meaning to follow the market or draft it) trades."
Above you can see where the mid-May SCTY price level would be, right near the neckline of a H&S price pattern/top.

I doubt there's any coincidence that the broad we were expecting a break-out/head fake move above the SPX's 3-month range and the $1900 level where range resistance was right at the same time, mid May, in fact the bear flag we suspected would sling shot prices higher was formed May 15-20th which is when and where we are talking about hitchhiking longs as well as the bear flag that started forming was looking as it would be used to create a short squeeze.

This is from May 16th as the bear flag was just forming...
"Most Technical traders won't short a bear flag itself without the confirmation of a break below the flag's support (bottom trendline), however on the break below the flag they will chase price and enter a short position. If the larger head fake move is actually to the upside, catching some shorts in a bear trap and forcing them to cover as price moves back above the flag and forces a small squeeze just adds more upside momentum to the head fake move."

The point being simple, it's not coincidence that the momentum stocks were looking ready for an upside move as the market was setting up a short squeeze move based around the bear flag from the 15-20th of May, which was only about a week after we had said the probabilities of the market turning lower from the 3-month range in the SPX are very low without an upside head fake move first as the range is just too obvious in the most watched ETF in the world.

This move is what set up most of the right shoulders we are seeing now in the averages like the IWM and watchlist stocks including SCTY.

We had another SCTY "Momentum Stocks Update" on May 20th which was the lowest close in SCTY (also very close to its neckline) since then, essentially the best entry you'd get SCTY long, SCTY Update. (Excerpts below in red)...

I haven't forgotten about the momentum stocks watchlist that I talked about on Friday, it just hasn't been  a very interesting list since Friday....You may recall that one of the breadth indicators I use from Worden's T2 series, is the Percentage of NYSE stocks trading  2 Standard Deviations Above their 40-day moving average; these tend to be momentum stocks and besides just knowing generally that they have been beaten down lately, we can see it on this indicator as they went from over 40% to 30% to 10% in just a matter of months, in other words they were beaten down pretty badly and this makes sense from an asset manager's allocation p.o.v., they want to get out of the high beta names and in to the blue chip, dividend paying names if they are going to be long.

The last sentence underlined and in bold above is interesting given the same indicator was featured in last night's End of day Wrap, A True Dead Cat Bounce? Except this is post-bounce and it is now showing a different set of indications than mid-May, see charts and excerpts from last night's post below (again last night's post comments are in red).

"Furthermore in looking closely at breadth indicators, I found this which may speak to high beta stocks that the market has been chasing all year and then some."
 " Percentage of NYSE Stocks Trading Two-Standard Deviations Above their 40-day Moving Average."



"Percentage of NYSE Stocks Trading Two-Standard Deviations Above their 200-day Moving Average.

In both cases, this is only the second time since late 1013 to early 2014 that the indicator in green (vs the SPX in red) have failed to make a higher high, in both cases the SPX had its biggest loss of the year, about -6% over 8-days.


Hopefully tomorrow we'll have some more insightful signals. All of the averages ended with 1 and 2 min negative divergences at the end of the day."

The point being, that these breadth indicators above, after the mid-May expected bounce led by none other than momentum stocks, which also tend to be the "Most Shorted" and as you know, a large part of the move from mid-May until now was "Short Squeeze" induced. The failure of these "Momentum/Most Shorted Stocks" to make a higher high with the SPX is likely proof of exactly what was said in mid-May regarding momentum stocks rallying...

"in other words they were beaten down pretty badly and this makes sense from an asset manager's allocation p.o.v., they want to get out of the high beta names and in to the blue chip, dividend paying names if they are going to be long." May 20th SCTY Update...

The point again being large institutional and hedge finds often carry single positions of a billion dollars, for some funds that's considered a "moderate" position size. I have often compared institutional money to a large oil tanker that needs miles to come to a stop whereas we are jet skis, we can get in and out of a trade in a single day and not move the market against our position as long as we are trading something fairly liquid (not penny stocks), it's not the same for institutional money, they need to create demand to unload a billion dollars worth of stock, they need to do it in to both demand and higher prices and in smaller pieces over a longer period. This is the entire concept of a head fake move, to create demand that they can unload in to. Remember, we confirm head fake moves as a real move won't show distribution whereas a head fake move will. The question then is simple, what do you need to do to get retail buying and sell in to strength as we know that has been the trend...

You may be tired of seeing this chart, but it illustrates the point being made...

Institutional money and hedge funds to a lesser degree (orange and blue) are net sellers (which includes short selling as both come across the tape as a sale) while retail (green) have been huge buyers, who do you think is selling to who?

I digress, back to the question, what will cause retail to buy after being eaten alive in a 3% wide 3 month range in the SPX?

A breakout above resistance and the psychological whole number of SPX 1900, both in the exact same place, at the breakout level or top of the 3-month range.
While this is a MACRO example of the head fake concept which essentially states that reversals (in this case to the downside) see a head fake move at least 80% of the time and in every asset and every timeframe so the concept is fractal, which means it works as well on a daily chart like the one above as it does on a 15 min chart. The key is to confirm the head fake move...

Confirmation of a head fake move, a large one. See "Understanding the Head Fake Move" articles on the upper right side of the member's site.

The second point in last night's breadth indicators failing to make higher highs is what we were looking for before the move began as long only funds move from high beta to Defensive, for instance, Utilities which I also showed last night outperforming the market of the 9 S&P sectors.

Back to SCTY (the point however is that SCTY is a proxy for the general market).


From the SCTY update of May 20th... SCTY Update

"Here are the charts and why SCTY is starting to look timely and interesting."
 "The recent 3C charts at the bottom of the right shoulder are showing the kind of divergences you'd want to see for such a price pattern, here the 1 min trend is leading positive at a new high as the lower right shoulder is formed, perfect."

" The 3 min chart shows a positive at the lows of the head and an even stornger leading positive at the lows of the right shoulder, just as you'd expect to see."

"The highest probability trade would be to catch SCTY and the overall broad market both in positive divergences and looking ready to make a move, the market will give SCTY something to draft."

The SPY broke out about a week before SCTY.

Now after SCTY's major move, featured this week on Tuesday, June 24th  as a Short trade "Set-Up" Trade Idea/Set Up: (Longer Term) SCTY

"SCTY... This is actually, a larger H&S stage 3 top and guess where? Right at the top of a right shoulder, the dominant theme among the watchlist."
" Here's the daily chart with a large H&S top at the top of the right shoulder"

" As for the 15 min chart which went positive to form the right shoulder as price was sitting on the neckline, it is now leading negative and I suspect it will get a lot worse.

Note the head fake move hitting stops before the upside reversal"

As for the 15 min chart getting "worse", here it is a mere 2-days later...
The white trendline is where the 15 min 3C chart was this Tuesday so it has in fact gotten worse, which would suggest there's been more institutional selling in to any price strength available.

and...
The SCTY 5 min chart as of Tuesday vs...

The 5 min chart as of today, it's lower than Tuesday, but more importantly is the move of the last 2 days has seen a steeper leading negative divegrence (red arrow to the far right). The 5 min chart (and shorter timeframes) is typically a good chart for timing of entries.

"The Trend Channel has held the entire right shoulder since 6/10, the trend is broken on a closing basis below $68.70."

And the Trend Channel now...
As I had said, the Trend Channel (one of our proprietary indicators) held the entire move since 6/10 on a closing basis, however it stopped out at the close of 6/24. The Trend Channel will NEVER take you out at the exact top and even after it is broken price can flip flop around in "volatility spasms", but after a decade of using it, I've found once the Trend Channel is broken, you are usually best off exiting the trade as you "may" hit a higher exit by chance, but more often than not, all of the easy gains are far behind and what you are left with is largely lateral volatility. Typically you'll find having exited at the stop out usually gives you the best return as volatility and unpredictability after that often result in gaps down below the initial trend channel exit.

Finally from Tuesday's update at 12:18 p.m.,

"Typically with a Doji/Star as a reversal candle, the confirmation candle of a downside reversal in about 50% of the cases over the next day or two, will gap up and then close down forming a bearish engulfing candle, confirming the downside reversal, that gap up with the 1-5 min charts going negative is an ideal entry and the lowest risk entry for a SCTY short position which I'd view as a longer term trending trade because of the size of the top.

I'll be setting alerts for a move/gap above $71.20 to look at a short in SCTY."

On 6/24 we didn't end the day with a Doji star (yellow arrow) as we had seen around noon time, but the numerous small bodies Stars (in the yellow box) are an indication of a loss of momentum and open SCTY up to a downside move.

The set-up I had envisioned as laid out above from the 6/24 "Trade Set-Up" was a gap up, thus the reason to set alerts above $71.20 on the open (which still haven''t been hit) as most decent bearish reversal confirmation candles start with a gap up and close lower like this bearish engulfing candle I attempted to draw in at the red arrow. The idea is to check the opening 3C charts on such a move, look for signs of distribution and enter there, however on a "bigger picture" basis, this is actually an excellent entry in this area with low risk as a stop can be placed a bit above the recent highs so long as it's not at an obvious place like whole numbers or resistance areas like $72.18.

As for other charts...

We do have a current sell signal on my custom DeMark-inspired Buy/Sell indicator..
The signals here have been pretty accurate.

Other 3C charts...
 The 1 min

An intraday view of the 1 min, there was some apparent accumulation in to the June 24th closing lows that sent SCTY higher, at the same time it loks like that was an intentional set-up to sell in to higher prices.

The 3 min chart shows the same negative divegrence in to higher prices today.

 Since you've already seen the 5 min chart, here's a different view, also with some accumulation on the 24th to send SCTY higher and apparent distribution in to higher prices.

And the 15 min trend through the H&S top pattern. 3C should make higher highs with price , if you look at where price is at point A and point B, you can see there are no higher highs in to higher prices which would be the head of the H&S pattern and at point C which has higher prices than point A, 3C is significantly lower.

That said, SCTY has been one of the strongest performers, just look at it's performance as a momentum stock pick, 41% vs the next closest, FB at 16% and volume has been rather high on the right shoulder which is not what we normally want to see with a H&S top.

For these reasons, I'm still an advocate of a gap up with confirmed 3C distribution, the set up I drew above with the candlesticks, this gives you a better entry and much lower risk as a stop can be placed right above the gap up if it ends the day as a bearish engulfing confirmation candle.








Market Update

It has been another strange day like yesterday with few intraday signals, however where they really count the signals are quite clear. I'm still not sure what the set up is Wall St. is trying to slip in to place, it appears to be a bear flag and we know they are usually head faked to the upside before failing, but how much does Bullard's comments this morning change things? It seems the market knew they were coming late yesterday as all of the major averages went negative on 1 and 2 min charts and picked up that forward forecasting in to today's open.

The TICK has virtually been trendless except to say that it has stayed more positive . The last two days are two of the strangest I've seen intraday, which of course makes me wonder about the strange change in market tone/character as these things are often some kind of red flag.

 TICK shows an unusual day of virtually no trend other than to say it has been fairly positive being mostly above zero.

Like yesterday, intraday SPY 1 min has been in line all day, except at yesterday's close when all of the averages went negative

SPY 2 min is showing the same type of negative character in 3C toward the afternoon/close as yesterday.

As QQQ is, but these are strange days being in line (green arrow) for so long, perhaps it's selling in to certain price strength levels and the morning and early part of the day is spent getting the averages back to those levels, I'll have to take a close look at where VWAP is.

 The IWM's character intraday has been quite negative as it was in to yesterday's close, but a lot worse today even though we are still looking at intraday trends, it almost seems like a very delicate dance to avoid knocking the market down, easing supply out in to higher intraday prices, this is what market makers/specialists get paid for.

However...

Where it counts on charts like this IWM 15 min, the trend is quite clear, strong distribution which fits considering where we are in the daily price pattern, the top of a right shoulder in a H&S top.

And the 60 min chart just makes that point more clear.

 As does the SPY (15 min)

Financials show the same where it counts, 15 min

And of course 60 min which makes me very interested in FAZ long, but perhaps I'm spending too much time looking at the intraday trade, getting lost in the lines when we have clear, very negative signals where it counts.

SRTY Charts

I was looking at SQQQ as a long position for this week, I was only looking for one thing to happen before entering and that was a run on stops which occurred on 6/24 as we saw a short squeeze that failed (when we entered QQQ puts around 11:30 a.m. Tuesday which are still at a +20% gain despite this consolidation).

I still like SQQQ, but already have exposure there and as far as calling out a new position, I just liked the way SRTY looked better when comparing the charts today. Both have some pretty amazing changes of recent and these leveraged ETFs tend to give strong and timely signals, I suppose because of the leverage.

Looking MoneyStream (created by the father of money-flow indicators, Don Worden), although it's not my favorite for close-up work and intraday signals, it is excellent for larger trends.
 This is the daily MoneyStream chart of SQQQ, that's quite a difference and as the downside rate of change of price falls off in to a lateral (base-like) trend.

SRTY "should" give a similar signal if this is a market wide event of distribution in the averages and accumulation of inverse ETFs... This is why we always confirm.

 SRTY daily, a very similar signal.

Again, if the premise is accumulation of inverse ETFs and distribution of the averages, we should see the opposite signals in the market averages, negative divergences. Pay particular attention to the tops I drew in with red trendlines and where the MoneyStream divergences are most extreme.
 QQQ at a Broadening Top...CONFIRMATION

IWM at a H&S top, CONFIRMATION

SPY at a Bearish Ascending Wedge, CONFIRMATION.

As far as SRTY's 3C charts go...


 Here's the 60 min, note the last positive divegrence led to a decent move up, this would have been during the decline from the top of the IWM's head to its neckline.


 A closer view of the 60 min which is leading positive on a very strong timeframe for underlying trade...

The 30 min with the same positive to the left, forecasting a move higher, what is also interesting is the negative divergences at the top of the move are very weak relative negatives.

Again the current positive is larger than anything on the chart's history and well above the 3C reading at the top of the rally.

 The same is true of the 15 min charts.

Even the 5 min chart is strongly leading positive, including the area where I was looking for a head fake this week at the 24th.

Here's a closer look at the stop run/head fake move expected this week for SQQQ, but really any inverse market correlated ETF, SRTY shows a strong leading positive divegrence suggesting the head fake move, the shares stopped out were accumulated,

GDX/NUGT Update

When I closed half of the NUGT long for a +46% gain or so, I couldn't bring myself to close the entire position, it was a "Just in case" precaution, I wanted to take some of the substantial gains off the table being there were and are signals for a pullback, but the first thing we should always respect about the market is it is dynamic and that's the last thing human emotion wants to respect, we want assurances, we want surety, we want guarantees, THE MARKET IS THE LAST PLACE TO FIND THOSE THINGS. 

Why do you think so many people flock to CNBC and Cramer? Because they offer what "sounds" to be, "guru-like" assurances, they speak as if they KNOW and people love that even though I recall CNBC saying 2007 was not a bubble, I even remember them having the author of "Dow 20,000" on just before the market started to crash (of course as always, in retrospect).

The BEST we have if we are truly honest about what the market is and how it is probably the MOST DYNAMIC entity on the face of the earth is, PROBABILITIES. Probabilities are what separate us from pure speculators/gamblers and we look to make a case based on objective evidence that stacks the probabilities in one direction or another, while doing our very best to leave our opinion out of the matter and let the market tells us which can be much harder than we realize at times given we are so vested in the outcome, personally and financially.

The point is, with NUGT, I can't be sure that it will pullback so I took gains and left half the position on because I know the probabilities of NUGT/GDX going much higher over the next 6-12 months is VERY high. You may even recall seeing pullback divergences in NUGT and GDX, yet we didn't take the positions off and doubled our gains as the divergences were rebuilt, not so much run-over.

I suspect the biggest problem for the market and the F_E_D is inflation, there's a trend, it's not noise and that means the F_E_D will have to hike rates, I've been saying it since the last CPI came in just before the last F_O_M_C and what do traders buy on inflation expectations? Gold.

Before QE, miners led gold, recently miners have led gold as QE is being phased out. With inflation on the rise, the F_E_D, as I have been saying every day, WILL HAVE to HIKE RATES.

What does Bullard say this morning?

  • BULLARD SAYS MARKETS DON'T APPRECIATE HOW CLOSE FED IS TO GOALS
  • BULLARD SAYS HE'S TRYING TO PUT EMPHASIS ON CLOSENESS TO GOALS
What are the goals? 2% inflation, Core CPI is already running hotter and their goal was 6.5% unemployment which we are already below, their "GOALS" have been met and surpassed.

The usually dovish Bullard is saying, "The Market doesn't understand how close we are to tightening" which is the case I've made because with inflation running hot, the F_E_D will HAVE NO CHOICE. Why did the F_E_D feel the need to put Bullard, a known Dove out there to carry this message? Because they are serious.

As far as how that relates to our NUGT position and perhaps some gold positions to come...lets stick with probabilities, charts...
 Looking at the larger picture in GDX (Gold Miners), we have an inverse H&S bottom and price sitting RIGHT AT THE NECKLINE, you don't get any closer to a stage 2 breakout than where we are right now, thus where NUGT (3x long Gold Miners) is right now. 

Look at the 2 hour 3C trend during this bottom formation, it's the exact opposite of what we see in assets like the SPY, QQQ, DIA, IWM, as it is leading positive in a HUGE way.

That's where the probabilities are and there's a good reason considering inflation, at least for now, when the F_E_D hikes it may be a different story.

NUGT 2 hour with confirmation of the same divergence on the 2 hour.

NUGT 60 min, what we expected to be a head fake move below the range to run stops did run stops, we expected accumulation in the area, there is accumulation in the area below the range, what we couldn't see that far in advance is another right shoulder forming and then rallying up to the larger picture's neckline, that's what we have right now.

The negative divegrence to the left is the pullback from the neckline to form the additional right shoulder area.

Since hitting the neckline, this 15 min chart has been giving signals for a pullback, not heavy distribution, but a likely buyable pullback. This is the reason for taking the gains off the table (half the position) as I would like to add the other half of the position back after the pullback has shown it has been accumulated and right before it starts moving up again, essentially getting a better price and adding more shares with the gains taken off the table.

However... Yesterday I set alerts for higher prices in GDX and NUGT , areas where I'd consider taking the rest of the position off, maybe adding a DUST long for a pullback in NUGT as the 1-5 min charts in NUGT improved.

I have to wonder if Wall St. knows something (as they always do) that we don't, in essence since the Core CPI last week, things have changed.
 The 10 min NUGT chart and a recent positive divergence. Perhaps this is not so much about selling NUGT at a higher level and getting ready for a pullback, perhaps this is, "The situation has changed since last week's CPI".

 The 5 min chart's divergence is where we see the first signs of institutional activity, this doesn't look like market makers adjusting inventories for a pullback or filling sell orders at the best levels before a pullback, this is starting to look like, "The situation, the timing of a major event has just been pushed up".

The trend of the 3 min chart is very positive, which would migrate to a positive on the 5 min and the 5 min divergence migrates to the 10 min as the underlying flow of accumulation gets stronger and this even in to a slight dip!

The 2 min chart shows the same, accumulation in to a slight dip which is where smart money would want to buy as they aren't chasing prices higher, they can't afford to with the size of their positions.

I'm really starting to re-think this entire NUGT situation. For now, I have to flow with the dynamics of the market and not fight them with opinions or what we "did see" a week ago, if the situation has changed, there's obviously good reason for it to have, CPI data.

I'm not sure if I'll add back the other half of NUGT, but for now I can't sell the remaining position still in place.