Friday, February 15, 2013

The Case for Gold / GLD

Wow, I wish I had seen the move in GLD earlier, but it was late in the day, you know I've been watching it and thinking it was going to be a long this week, but just wasn't there yet, in fact on Tuesday, Feb 12th of this week, I posted "Another Tricky One"

In this post I did my standard precious metals boilerplate in which I tell you how much I hate analyzing gold and silver because they (especially silver/SLV) are so blatantly manipulated.

I also said that I had seen some very strong signals, but on 1 or two timeframes, as if 3C had caught institutional activity that was short and sneaky at EXACTLY the right time.  I went on about currency wars making Gold attractive theoretically and that I thought there was an edge in gold, I just didn't have enough information to define the trade and the most important part, "When". You can go back and check out the post and some follow ups in which yesterday I said I thought GLD needed some more time, maybe a day.

So here's the story and it's a good one even if you don't want to trade gold, there's something for everyone to put int heir tool box.

 This is a good old fashioned Technical Analysis set up and since most technical traders do the exact same thing they did in 1995, they get beaten up, beaten down, violated in every manner and just otherwise roundly abused because Wall Street knows exactly what they are thinking, exactly what they will do and it's easy to win a game you control when you know exactly what your opponent will do.

From a technical trader's view point, GLD is in a down trend, an intermediate downtrend with the primary trend being lateral. The red arrows are what Technical traders see and what they expect. Do you see the symmetrical triangle starting at the beginning of the year? A symmetrical triangle has no bullish or bearish bias on its own, it's one of 3 different consolidation/continuation triangles and the only one that has no bias in and of itself. The bias as to whether it's bearish or bullish depends completely on the preceding trend before it was formed; we can easily identify that trend as a downtrend and therefore the triangle is considered a bearish consolidation/continuation price pattern. Until last week the triangle fulfilled the consolidation part, as the triangle closes in and forms an apex (where the two trend lines meet and form the point of the triangle), technical traders expect the triangle to break down below support and start the next leg down which is roughly equivalent to the preceding leg down (in this case, about 14 points lower, measured from the apex).

Because a triangle is more bearish if it breaks before the apex is formed, few traders will short the price pattern, most will wait to chase price on a break below support or they'll stack up limit orders and stops right below support where the pros can see them.

I put the break down from the triangle in a yellow box, which implies this is a head fake move or a false move, which makes for a great buy at very low prices and very low risk.

 Here we have some candlesticks and volume which can make a candlestick pattern high probability or VERY high probability, although they have no measuring implications, simply a reversal, it could be a day, it could start a new bull/bear market.

From left to right, the first red arrow shows a reversal candle called and "Evening Star", the increased volume makes it higher probability a a downside reversal which it was. The next candle at the yellow arrow has the volume and some might say it's a bullish hammer, it's not though, the lower wick of the candle should be at least twice the size of the real body which is the shaded green area that marks the open to close and leaves out the daily high/low, so that is a false candle and worthless. The next white arrow is a true "Bullish Hammer" (hammers can only be bullish) and the heavy volume makes it high probability as a reversal and as support.

Then in the yellow box we have the break below the triangle which traders will sell and short, but that's not enough, because there's clear support from the hammer to the left, it's likely most of the orders are lined up below that hammer and because traders put their orders in with their brokers rather than keep them in their head, just about anyone with a brokerage account knows where all the orders are, Wall St. makes money running those orders and that's what happened today, the volume alone tells you.

We also closed today with a bullish hammer and huge volume, a bullish development on it own.

 Looking intraday on a 15 min chart, from left to right-

The small white box has a bearish resistance area called a tweezer top, it's two candles with the exact same high, volume is increased, it's a good signal for lower prices.

The next red arrow has heavy volume as first support is broken, that was the previous day's lows, a lower low.

Later in the day another support level was broken triggering more stops, this is important because few people know about it, that's the morning range. When a morning range develops, it forms support and resistance and which ever way the breakout from the range goes (up or down) is likely the direction the stock will close in.

At the yellow arrow some additional stops are hit from a break below major support from the daily hammer, even though it was already hit, thus volume isn't that high.

At the orange arrow the gap down hits stops logged in with the broker, this morning a 15 min bullish candle forms on heavy volume and that's new support.


 Here's my "X" indicator's buy and sell signals, to the far left you would have missed 22% upside if you sold, but that also was the end of a trend stretching back to 2005, so it's pretty effective I think considering the 300+% run.

The buy signal was perfect and the last sell signal didn't leave much on the table. The yellow area is out "Head Fake Options Trade worth about 215% in 4 days" 

Imagine that, if you just understand the market a bit more than the next guy, you can make as much money in 4 days as they made in 4 years.


 This is the new 3C on a 60m chart, the positive divergence going in to the triangle was a hint, it reminds me a lot of the bottom we called at June 4th of 2012 as that was a triangle with a positive divergence too, the bottom was the head fake break below the triangle. "A" is the positive divergence, "B" is the triangle and 3C in line, "C" is a positive leading divergence on the break below the triangle.


 As for today, the 15 min chart was one of the first warning me of a possible long trade earlier this week, it stayed increasingly leading positive.


 It's the last 2 hours of the day and this leading positive 5 min chart that really caught my attention.

The 2 min chart confirms it as well, beautiful, as I said, it's usually the last hour or so on op-ex days.

I quickly checked the Gold futures themselves, a totally different market, totally different asset (real gold futures rather than an ETF) and a totally different version of 3C, here's the confirmation I found...


YG (Mini Gold Futures)
 60 min positive

 15 min positive

5 min positive

With today's ugly dump, this is the perfect example of Buffet's, "I buy when there's blood in the streets", except we actually have some confirmation and not just a saying.



GLD Went w/ Mar 16 $150 Calls

OOOHHH- GLD

I'll never get the charts out in time, but I love GLD long right here, I don't know how long it lasts, but love it!!!

ZNGA Charts

Truth be told, even when I'm full on bearish, I prefer to be 75% short and 25% long in quality longs, not just any long.

The first half of ZNGA was closed at a 43% gain or so, I thought we'd get more so left the rest open.

Current position-what's left of it, still a 41% gain

 Beautiful chart on my X-over system, ZNGA has a lot more upside in the coming months

 After a break out, the first pullback is ALMOST ALWAYS to the 10-day sma, RSI is fine, as is my custom indicator.

 The daily positive, beautiful.

Here's the negative for the pullback and the positive on the pullback, this is why I think it runs 1 more time before a bigger pullback

I Still like ZNGA Long

This is REALLY speculative and it's for 1 more run before a deeper pullback, but I like it. In fact I'm going to try some Feb $3 Calls in addition to the half equity position still open at a nice gain, I'll try to get charts out ASAP.

Energy and ERY

I haven't said anything about picking up ERY on a pullback because there hasn't been one and I haven't said anything beyond I like this area (that means if I wanted to I'd have no problem buying ERY here, but if I only had a little to add, I'd be more picky and if I miss it, no big deal, I'm already set for the most part).

It does, as of now, look like ERY will pullback a bit, but you have to remember these are short term charts, even though they are bouncing back in the market (remember I said I wasn't convinced about the downside move on the WMT news, meaning I still felt the market had some additional upside intraday), but that is an example of how the shorter term charts "Can" be steam rolled, this doesn't happen often, it happens when we are near a market turn and just as it happened with AAPL, instead of getting that slightly better short sale  entry on some short term positive divergences, the Hedge Funds all broke from the normal herd and said, "He who sells first, sells best" and there goes your intraday divergences (1-3 min.)

Energy and ERY charts...
 XLE 60 min, to the far right, that's the big trouble

 XLE 30m, the head fake move, it's already been identified a a head fake, any longs who bought the breakout lost money and many would have been stopped out as they put their stops way too close at "Support", the negative divergence tells us what we need to know about what smart money was doing selling to retail.

 Intraday 1 min, positive so XLE can run and ERY pullback

 XLE 2 min, intraday the same thing, note the distribution in the head fake move.


 3 min XLE, again, distribution in the head fake move, small positive in the area.

 ERY 2 min looks like it will pullback a bit, that's why I prefer not to chase if I don't have to.

 ERY 15 min on its own head fake move, just the opposite result.

ERY 60 min, al of you who asked for weeks whether it was time to even start phasing in to ERY long and I said, "Be Patient", doesn't this look a lot better?

UNG and ES intraday

Two in one...

S&P futures intraday are leading a bit more now, "Patience Grass-hopper"

So I think that will probably keep us close to yesterday's close or at least not on another WMT goose chase, but as we get closer to the close and there are fewer contracts out there, we tend to see some underlying trade shift around to the more volatile side.

I'd consider a weekly call/put if the signal were there, but the G20 is a fundamental event and it's a long weekend.

As for UNG, remember this is an investment-like position, rather than trade, I went with April calls, but that's even kind of far out for me.

As for intraday action, it's doing what I thought it would this morning, there are few "V" reversals.

 This is at least the third week in a row that there was distribution setting up a move down on EIA Nat Gas Thursday, and that's what sent UNG down yesterday on a draw that was about 1% off consensus, hmmm.

The 5 min chart shows additional leading positive divergence today as UNG is below yesterday's close.

The same with the 10-min chart.

Maybe UNG ha another day to go , I suppose it depends on how it looks near the close, but I'd still go for the April calls today.


Another Update

Looking at the futures and as I said before I knew the initial stage of the decline was about WMT, I don't think the upside move is over, the futures are leading, but very tiny, probably enough though.

As for ERY, I'm going to put out charts next, the thing is the bigger picture there is so ugly, it seems to be hanging by a thread (Energy I mean)

Market Update

Like that asteroid passing some 14,000 miles from earth, which is a hair, today is a little too close for comfort, this is why we plan our trades and trade our plan. I've seen, both on the charts and in research papers I wasn't supposed to see, how far in advance Wall Street plans their trades, if there's one thing I have learned and have to keep learning, it's patience.

I'm not chasing anything here, especially when most positions are set and whatever room there is, is reserved for really amazing entries.

However, there are quite a few things that are a bit too close for comfort. The market doesn't react yesterday to the Global GDP dump/recession, but WMT says their sales stink and the market flops. While you may or may not be impressed with the % of stocks above their 40 sma or some standard deviation of that all falling big time, that's one of those things that I consider to be in the category, "You have to see what the crowd missed to make money" and a few other recent charts just have the feel of walking on thin ice and at this point, not knowing if a WMT internal email about sales or a carry trade going south is going to break down this market, but I'm not budging from where I'm at.


There are some impressive charts in the volatility ETFs, and these few below are scary, if I were a bull...

 DIA

 IWM

QQQ

 SPY

The first time in over a week the TICK has hit in the -1250 area...

There are still a few positive divergences that I think are probably enough to hold together for now, we don't know what the g20 does, but if experience is our guide, not much. The thing is, when those divergences, the few that remain that offer hope of some entries on the short side at better prices, break, there's not much left.

One of those times the TICK helps...

 The first capture... Note the trendlines...


The second capture with TIC breaking through the trendlines.


Your Guess, D-14 or WMT?

We have a 150 foot asteroid making a near earth pass-by at 2:25, right now, so this is maybe scaring a few traders or....

Or....


"February MTD sales are a total disaster,” Jerry Murray, Wal-Mart’s vice president of finance and logistics, said in a Feb. 12 e-mail to other executives, referring to month-to-date sales. “The worst start to a month I have seen in my ~7 years with the company....

To help you decide...

The SPY in green, WMT in red, the started the exact same time.

These are the fundamental surprises that in a highly complacent market like this with everyone leveraged up that can cause pandemonium and why I chose to hold and hedge shorts if need be than try to trade around them, this isn't the time to get fancy, it's the time to stick with probabilities.

UNG April Calls Update

I have received a lot of emails as to whether I still like UNG today as I did yesterday, the answer is yes I do, I thought earlier and wrote to many of you that UNG would head toward $17.65 or so today, roughly around yesterday's lows for a small "W" bottom, as it pulls in to that area the divergences are going positive which is what I wanted to see.

So, I still like UNG in this area

Quick Update

We're getting some obvious downside and volatility intraday here, but I'm not convinced this is it on the upside, I'm going to be a bit patient with this

SPY/SPX Update

While we have  little intraday bounce going, by the way, you don't need a lot of fancy indicators to get some really good information from the market intraday and if you string enough intrday clues together, you'll even get some longer term pictures. You just need to type in the intraday NYSE TICK symbol ($TICK) which is the number of NYSE advancers minus decliners.

For example...
The TICK is green on a 1 min chart, the SPY is red. Draw trendlines around the TICK's range, or just eye-ball it, note the nice downtrend, the pops in the SPY at 10 am and 11 am had no support from more advancing stocks, therefore they weren't likely to hold or advance  to a new trend, if you wanted to, you could have played some weekly options (buy puts right there) and sold them at the first sign of the TICK changing course. THE TICK almost always breaks its trend/channel before prices reverse.

Now for the SPY...
 1 min SPY positive divergence suggests some more upside.

 The 5 min is more important, it has a pretty nasty negative divergence in the area, this is part of the change of recent intraday character I mentioned earlier.

 Take a look at the trend of this 3 min chart, there's been almost or no price advance through all of that negative divergence/distribution, yo can probably see why it might be hard.

 Here's where things are interesting, we always knew that the 2 trends we could see coming, #1 to the upside and #2 following that to the downside, were going to be intense, I just figured #1 was going to be more volatile and shorter lived, the advance is about right as we were throwing around the words "New highs" before it started, it's the length and low volatility that were off. However when volatility did pick up briefly around the yellow area, look at the change from confirmation of trend #1 to a deep leading negative divergence, remember that's a 3 min chart.

 The white area is the start of trend #1, green arrow=confirmation of the trend, red is negative divergence and yellow is where volatility picked up, see a pattern here?

 On a cleaner, less detailed 30 min chart, it's the same thing.

Now loo at the Percentage of stocks (all) that are trading 2 standard deviations above their 40 day moving average, with new highs in the area, that would not be surprising, but when volatility picks up, note how they fall from 44% of all stocks to 14%.

Coincidence?

Don't let this low volatility drift fool you, stay on your toes, it' easy to let this grind you down and let your guard down, that's what they're counting on.

AMZN Update

I'm glad I closed the AMZN Calls that were hedging the equity short position, the plan thus far worked perfectly, the calls hedged the short, made +70% and the AMZN equity short is at break-even so the total AMZN position thus far has made about 50% of the AMZN core position (It's a weird way to look at it with the hedge and all, but it's doing well).

The point is, yesterday I considered looking at Puts today for AMZN just to juice the start of a move as the AMZN equity short is filled out, we have a little bounce brewing in the market and it looks like AMZN is going to benefit from that as well, it's what AMZN looks like after the bounce that determines whether or not puts will be added, but this is why I like the idea of not only possibly adding puts, but the equity short...

 If there's one thing I like to see when taking a position (even long, think about our first long in FB when everyone hated it ) it's a change in character, AMZN's recent volatility (yellow) which is where the last short was, is just what I like to see, the volume on those days is a bonus.

 This 2 hour chart is a very long, very strong map of underlying trade, from accumulation from December of 2011 through March of 2012, a big move, then distribution, a smaller accumulation area to support AMZN and an even larger distribution area. These charts, especially on the right side are hard for people to get their head around if we aren't moving in the direction of the signal which in this case is down big time, it takes some experience (which is what it should take) to start to understand and trust these. Luckily for me and maybe you, I have many years of experience in reading these.

 The 30 min chart shows where the add-to/last short was, you don't get much more timely than that and where I decided to put on a long options hedge.

 This shows what happened in to the upside correction, I'm glad those calls were closed yesterday.

 Here's the 1 min chart I mentioned in the last post about the market seeing an upside bounce and how it may be useful which I'll show you in the SPY next.

 Now I can't say where AMZN is going, but probabilities say down, whether it forms a large top at one of the trendlines, I don't know, with a trend that long, it deserves to, but that will largely depend on the tone of the market as it is the strongest gravitational pull on stocks in general on an every day basis (not including earnings). Check out advancers/decliners, you'll see the market's direction accounts for about 65% of the action in most stocks. Industry groups come next, the least influential is the actual stock which people have a really hard time coming to terms with because everyone looks at the stock when they should look at the market first, then industry groups and then pick a stock.

 If I show you this accumulation of AMZN over nearly a 2 year period (on and off), you can probably accept that it is true as AMZN has rallied ever since, but...

If I show you the complete picture, you might be able to accept the stage 1 accumulation because you see prices went up for a long time, you can probably accept #2 where there's some distribution because prices went down after that , you might accept #3 because again prices pulled back pretty hard, but #4 distribution is hard to accept because of where price is, but isn't that the point, but low/sell high? Did they not buy low?

So this is why I like AMZN short, but I've had the benefit of seeing how #4 turns out.