Monday, December 8, 2014

Daily Wrap

There's really not too much to write tonight because all of the analysis had been done before hand leading in to today's decline with transports (despite low oil  prices) and small caps led the way lower.

As of last Friday, it was apparent we were seeing the same kind of negative action we saw the previous Friday leading to a smack down on futures open last Sunday and a parabolic drop last Monday on the open that had created a short term oversold condition (high volume on a parabolic drop) by the first hour, by 10:30 last Monday we were already anticipating an oversold bounce which occurred most of last week with the RUT leading as we predicted and QQQ lagging also as predicted with all of the usual suspects as the levers which failed in to the end of last week.

Some notable posts from Friday included:

The morning's 9:25 a.m. A.M. Update which ended with,

"In addition to the same 5 and 7 min negative divergences seen late Friday last week that led to the sharp decline when futures opened Sunday night and the cash market Monday morning, this in addition to the various other timeframes posted last night as well, it seems we have another full house of negatives across the futures..."

It was clear from the a.m. that the market was starting to fall apart. Posts after that on Friday that just made the case stronger included:

At 10:47 a.m., IWM & QQQ Short are looking very interesting here "with the Q's having just made their intraday highs minutes earlier."

Quick Futures Update, "It looks like the market is about to come down, remember today is an op-ex Friday so there is a pin range most likely until about 2 p.m.

In any case, the Index futures intraday charts are starting or are continuing to look weaker ..."

Index Futures' 3C charts moving lower  "This afternoon could get very interesting, as for right now , along with the last update, ES, TF and NQ (SPX, Russell 20000 and NASDAQ 1000 futures) are seeing significantly worse intraday deterioration, I wouldn't mention it if it were not of note." 


Index Futures Like Last Week "Again those same divergences are in place. With the larger picture divergences shown again last night, I don't know how anyone could possibly ignore them unless they haven't seen the ability of Leading Indicators to give signals, in this case they are literally off the charts, larger than seen previously.

I'll remain short, remain patient and add where possible when possible
.
"


And the Yield Curve continued to flatten today with Yields on the long end falling 5-7 bps and on the short end falling 1-2 bps, again...FLATTENING the curve which some people claim is a prelude to a bear market and/or recession, while that has been true in the US something like 7 of 7 times, it hasn't had any real correlation in Japan, in either case, not good for the market.

As of Sunday night (last night) it felt like a replay of last week (Friday and Sunday leading to some sharp, fast downside in the averages)...

Futures Opening Indications for the New Week which was calling for ES/SPX futures weakness, NQ/NASDAQ futures weakness, TF/Russell 2000 weakness, USD/JPY weakness, $USDX weakness and specifically, gold strength... with these charts in specific...(*post continues AFTER italics below)

"As of tonight as Index futures open trade for the new week, many, actually all are reflecting the same negative tone from Friday, especially toward the close and just after.

 ES / SPX E-mini Futures 1 min with tonight's trade / open seeing a continued strong-looking leading negative divegrence (the stronger form vs a relative divegrence such as seen at Friday's intraday highs during the cash market-red arrow in the middle of the chart).

 TF /Russell 2000 futures also seeing a continued , strengthening 1 min leading negative divegrence as futures open tonight, picking up where 3C left off on Friday at the close of futures. Again, this is the stronger type of divegrence (leading) vs a relative negative or relative positive divergence  both of which can be seen during regular cash hours Friday at the highs (red arrows) and right at the close (white arrow).

And NQ / NDX 100 futures with a continuing negative 3C trend that is leading tonight- Friday showed several weaker form relative negative divergences, negative around the release of the BLS's Non-Farm Payrolls (8:30 a.m.) and in the early afternoon with a relative positive at morning lows.

Of course this is just the open of futures trading, they are 1 min divergences and we have a long night ahead of us, but this is the opening indication for Index futures.
 USD/JPY, after showing an "Inline" 3C trend (price/3C trend confirmation) as sops were run @>$121, there's a leading negative divegrence in the popular carry pair.

In addition, while the Yen is in line thus far tonight...

The $USDX is showing a fairly large relative negative divegrence from the range post the $USD's payrolls gains on Yen and Euro weakness . I find ranges that seem to be quiet and dull have the most active underlying trade. Of course a weakening $USDX would likely mean a lower USD/JPY, again it's still early, but those are the opening indications.

I did notice one other asset showing an interesting divergence, gold futures...
A relative positive over a pretty decent short term period."

So as today ended, the SPX -.73%, RUT -1.29%, Dow -.59%, NDX100 -.77% and Transports which we have been all over recently as a short entry, -1.36% despite lower oil prices.

Opening Indications posted this morning already showed us USD/JPY weakness, the USDX had lost ground while the Yen gained ground-part of our macro themes for each currency. Index futures also lost ground pre-cash open overnight.

By the close...

USD/JPY lost even more ground...
 USD/JPY between regular cash market hours loses more ground, largely due to the divegrence evident last night and part of our weakneing macro trend in $USDX...
 Which also lost additional ground through regular hours, but has put in a positive divegrence at the 2:15-ish afternoon lows, perhaps part of the "bounce" I mentioned later today.

And the Yen (/6J) gained additional ground (pressuring USD/JPY lower) , but again like $USD, put in a negative divegrence near the late afternoon, again, part of the bounce I had been talking about? In any case, it's not anything Im concerned about, it's normal behavior, but the macro trends are in trouble for the broader market.

USD/JPY was off with the normal ES/SPX futures correlation early on, but after the European close, they were stuck like glue.
 Earlier USD/JPY (candlestick) vs Es (purple), out of sync until after the European close, then the rest of the day...

Sorry, my ES line (purple) is a bit broken around the afternoon, but you can see the correlation pull together right after Europe closed.

And Gold futures which we had seen with a positive divegrence last night....GLD up +1.18% on the day and YG/Gold futures...
Sunday night futures open as posted last night with a positive divegrence, and in line the rest of the day!

I have a feeling though that the gains aren't going to hold or that we may remain range bound so for now, I'll keep the GLD short open...

Numerous gold futures timeframes are negative or in line at best including this 15 min, so beyond the short term 1 min from last night and today, I'm not sold on further gains right now.

As for oil, I've been asked about it quite often the last several days. There's not great multiple timeframe confirmation for a bounce or what I suspect may be a short squeeze first and we are no where near a tradable and trustable bottom area, however I'm not hot on oil short either right now because of the probability of a short squeeze at some point, even though I feel like trying to catch one would be dumb luck until/unless we get more consistent divergences suggesting such a move which we may still. However on playing oil short, we do have what looks to be a heavy volume exhaustion gap from 11/28. Just like capitulation events, it's not uncommon for an exhaustion gap to see several more days of lower prices, much like when we get a Trend Channel stop out and price gets volatile and choppy-although the easy money of the trend is over, there can be some additional gains, it's just usually not worth the risk trying to get them. So as for a long on a short squeeze, until/unless we get more consistent signals I feel the edge is no better than gambling and picking the day of a short squeeze (again unless we get more consistent divergences) is essentially dumb luck and as for oil short, with that exhaustion gap on volume in place, I don't like that trade either, it's just not high probability/low risk at this point. I'd rather look for solid signals or a real, tradable bottom that can support a real move rather than just random, extreme volatility.

I'm not convinced of a bounce just yet and even if I was, I'd call it a speculative trade, not in line with the stronger probabilities, but perhaps worth a trade if things come together, but right now, very much along the lines of what I posted this afternoon in the major averages...
Using NQ/NASDAQ 100 futures as an example, they have the clear negative we were seeing last night carrying them lower today as you can see during cash hours and they have a current negative right now, but that would be in line with a possible "W" bottom just as mentioned for the major averages, so the negative divegrence suggesting more downside for the NASDAQ futures "MIGHT", pull in to the area near today's lows and form a "W" bottom (if so there would likely be a stop run/head fake move just below today's intraday lows), if we saw accumulation at a second "W" bottom and a stop run that is accumulated as well, then that may be worth a short term speculative trade, the charts right now suggest that's a possibility, not yet a probability until we see if there's accumulation near today's intraday lows.

However don't be fooled, this is normal behavior, it doesn't change the macro trends and it would be a speculative bounce at best.

The 5 min charts aren't telling us much more yet than what I just mentioned above as far as short term possible bounces and whether they are worth the risk of trading...
 ES 5 min with a clear change in character of 3C late last week in to the new week with the positive divegrence at the intraday lows today that "may" be the start of a wider base needed for even a bounce, see the white trendline, price would need to pullback to that area and show improving short term 3C positive divergences, however beware that even with those divergences, a head fake move/stop run below intraday lows today would be about an 80+% probability and that would be where we'd want to look in to any long positions, at the stops run below intraday lows as that's where supply would be abundant for institutional money to pick up shares in size and on the cheap, thus giving us a better entry for a speculative long bounce trade and lowering risk as well as letting  THE TRADE COME TO US ON OUR TERMS AND PROVE ITSELF VIA POSITIVE DIVERGENCES BEFORE WE EVER ENTER... AN EXCELLENT ENTRY, LOW RISK, HIGH PROBABILITY SET UP.

PATIENCE PAYS! However, I doubt very much I'd change any core short positions for such a bounce, I'd much rather have trades aligned with highest probabilities and treat a bounce as a speculative trade.

 The longer 7 min ES chart shows the same negative divegrence we saw late last week just like the prior week (Black Friday) with a small positive at the day's lows, not enough in itself to warrant anything other than paying attention at this point.

While the 7 min TF/Russell 2000 futures continues to lead negative, it was the leader last week and as such may have worse relative performance this week, while the blue chips would be likely to have better relative performance.

This is what I mean by the highest probabilities, the 30 and 60 min charts mentioned last night and this morning reflect the highest probabilities as they do with the averages as well...
 ES 60 min negative and leading negative divegrence are easily the highest probability resolution, to the downside.

That's not even including the Broadening top and head fake move in SPX...
SPX daily ending the 2013 trend with a Broadening top with at least 5 points of contact, a shakeout-head fake move along the lines of our H&S head fake shakeout of new shorts who enter on the break of the neckline and almost any head fake move along the lines of a channel buster in which this move (breaking below the trendline and then back above), creates enormous momentum, just as  the head fake move ABOVE the upper trendline sets a bull trap, creating enormous downside momentum as they are forced to sell at differing levels, depending on risk tolerance, but a break below the lower trend line will lead to new lower lows which is what we expected to occur after a strong October rally and we expected this BEFORE the strong October rally even begun. Essentially we have a bear trap that squeezes shorts for upside momentum and a bull trap that stops out longs, adding to supply on a break below trendlines and moving averages.

 The 30 min TF chart shows equally negative longer term charts.

As does the NQ/NASDAQ futures 60 min, again currently reflecting another move to the downside which "could" form a short term toe hold, "W" base and bounce, but all a shakeout move.

The daily chart and divergences at the end of July cycle down to the August lows and base with the August cycle / rally to the September head fake highs and divegrence leading to stage 4 decline and the October lows and stage 1 base with a huge leading negative divegrence now, much bigger than the last two pivot highs.

As for Leading Indicators...
 Our custom SPX/RUT Raio confirmation/non-confirmation indicator and VIX term structure indicator below vs the SPY above.

Note on a longer scale the VIX term structure inversion and buy signals at the SPY candles and indicator bars painted white. Also note the SPX/RUT ratio giving positive divergences vs SPY price as well as the negative / non-confirmation signals at the September head fake highs and right now in the October cycle which is in stage 3 top/distribution, the next stage is 4, DECLINE.

On a shorter term basis (I took out the VIX term structure as there are no signals beyond the two above), note the non-confirmation at the yellow trend line and at the white in which our SPX/RUT ratio is calling for a move lower which has clearly begun.


 VIX (blue) vs SPX with prices inverted to show relative performance among the correlation, VIX was outperforming the SPX early today, leading to further afternoon downside (remember SPX prices intraday are reversed .

High Yield Corporate Credit, as the saying goes, "Credit leads, stocks follow", although HYG is used as a short term lever to ramp the market ...
 HYG was used as a lever, in fact as we knew the oversold bounce was coming last week as of Monday morning, I posted this, Meet Your Levers on Monday just after 1 p.m. so we clearly were expecting an oversold bounce off Monday morning's parabolic drop on big volume, a short term oversold condition. HYG was one of several levers we suspected the market would NEED to even get off an oversold bounce, there's a message in the market when it's so weak it can't even get off an oversold bounce for a few days without a half dozen ramping levers.

You can see where HYG led prices higher and where it failed as we saw negative 3C divergences suggesting HYG was done as a lever and traders of HY credit were no longer willing to take the risk, today is a good reason why.



 Intraday HYG led the SPX lower early in the morning as VIX also outperformed.

 A larger view of HYG's local support and larger dislocation with equity markets. HY credit is  a risk asset, it "should" generally rally with other risk assets like stocks unless the credit market which is much more sophisticated knows something stocks don't or at least won't at present. THIS IS ONE OF THE MANY SCREAMING RED FLAGS I MENTIONED ABOVE IN WONDERING HOW ANYONE COULD BE LONG AND IGNORE THESE SIGNALS.

 On an even larger basis, HYG leads the SPX by 4-7 days at the August lows#1 (it bottoms first and heads higher first, leading the SPX / market higher @#2, then fails and dislocates negatively right at the stage 3 head fake move at the September highs @#3 followed by more leading as 3C showed HYG divergence in October to which I commented, "There's only 1 reason to accumulate HYG here", that was to lead the market off the lows @ #4, but HYG soon gave out @#5 and is now at one of the largest dislocations I have seen vs the SPX, a glaring RED FLAG @#6 !

And an even larger view from HYG in line with the SPX to making a series of lower highs and lower lows vs the SPX doing the opposite, again  a glaring red flag.

While we are on High Yield Credit, it has been giving very clear recent negative signals which have been part of our analysis expecting a move lower.
 HY recently leading the SPX lower

On a larger timeframe

And here making new lows below the Bullard dove comments of mid-October.

As for the Leading Indicator, "Pro sentiment", it has been leading the market lower both locally, on a larger scale and in a huge way and intraday, all negative red flags for the market.

 Locally leading the market lower...

 Intraday

And on a larger basis, note all leading indicators are dislocated at the same area and at levels we have never seen before!

TLT/20+ year bond fund was showing a clear flight to safety of bonds today.
You may recall the strong 3C positive divergences in TLT telling us it was going higher last week.


As mentioned above, the long end of the yield curve dropped 5-7 basis points, leading the market lower.
 The recent 3C accumulation in TLT has seen the long end of the yield curve move lower, which is why Yields are one of my favorite leading indicators, they  are like a magnet for equity prices as you can see the negative dislocation locally and...

The huge dislocation on a larger scale, again almost all leading indicators have failed at the same place/same time and to the same incredible degree.


Internals- Today's Dominant Price/Volume Relationship is in all 4 major averages, there's 13 Dow, 53 NDX100, 817 Russell 2000 and 205 SPX-500, the relationship is a short term oversold, CLOSE DOWN/VOLUME UP. This relationship often results in a next day close higher as it is a short term oversold condition.

In addition, of the 9 S&P sectors, 3 closed green led by the defensive Utilities sector at a +.81% gain and lagging with Energy at a loss of -4.05%. This too is a short term oversold condition with only 3 of 9 green.

As for the 238 Morningstar Industry/Sub-Industry groups we track, a VERY pathetic, 35 of 238 closed green, ANOTHER DEEPLY OVERSOLD SHORT TERM SIGNAL. Between the Dominant P/V, the S&P and Morningstar sectors, I'd say we do have a short term oversold condition and have a high chance of a bounce, but I do want to see 3C evidence supporting that before considering any trade.

Friday I did mention the VIX move outside the Bollinger Bands intraday and close back inside, not the true buy signal I was hoping to see, but close enough obviously for today, however despite the pinching Bollinger Bands indicating we are about to see a highly directional move in VIX and our custom buy/sell indicator on a buy signal, VIX has not yet broken out of the BB channel, so we're not even in to any thing serious on the downside yet as for the market broadly speaking.
Note my custom buy/sell DeMark based indicator with a perfect sell signal last tie at VIX pivot highs and recent buy signal at VIX lows and of course Friday's intraday tail outside the Bollinger bands and close within, it is still siting inside the pinch, waiting for a highly directional move to the upside.

Today also gave us the 4th Hindenburg Omen in 5 days, a clear cluster (some say 5) which hasn't been seen since the September highs. Whether 4 or 5, the disparity between new highs and lows along with the McClellan Oscillator in a clear negative divegrence, the cluster is not good news for the market.

The MCO is clearly in Hindenburg territory, below zero as well as being divergent vs the SPX.
McClellan Oscillator vs SPX...

While not used (by me) as Hindenburg confirmation, the vertical move upwards in new hi/lo for NYSE stocks is part of what causes the Hindenburg Omen.
High Low Logic Index vs the SPX, not the vertical parabolic move.

The Cumulative Volume Index has gone severely negative after the recent freeze in breadth indicators (bad in itself as they aren't confirming the market).

As I saw last week with a increasing Rate of Change, the Percentage of ALL NYSE Stocks ABVOVE their 200-Day Moving Average has rolled over just as I had predicted, just because I'm use to seeing differences in Rates of Change, I demonstrated using a 5-bar moving average on the indicator...
Indicator in green, 5-day ma in yellow turning down and SPX in red. Not only is there a large divegrence with the indicator making lower lows/highs, but right now only about 48% of all NYSE stocks are above their 200-day moving average, meaning more than half are essentially already in a bear market and it's turning even lower!!!!

The Percentage of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving average is near the 50% mark and turning lower as well as being long term divergent vs the SPX, breadth is a mess. The stock market may be near all time highs, but the market of stocks is in a virtual bear market, this is due to the magic of weighting of the indices and buying the weighted stocks. As recently mentioned, VISA carried 9.42% of the Dow's weighting while General Electric carries on 0.93%, so if you want to goose the market, which stock do you buy?

Just about every Breadth Indicator is massively divegrence and nearly all are getting ready to roll over to new lows.

To make matters worse, the Black Swan Index, SKEW is printing at nearly 138, meaning someone is buying a lot of deep out of the money puts which are only worth something if the market falls hard and hits those deep out of the money strikes so apparently someone knows something the market is not yet reflecting in the averages alone , although every where else, or there's MASSIVE hedging for the same reason.

That will do it for tonight, I'll check futures before turning in and update if anything pops up, otherwise we are in a bad spot, but may have a short term oversold bounce on a very short term scale, but as always, the market will do its best to make the largest group p of people wrong at any one time, don't get thrown off track, you know where probabilities lay, they are SCREAMING!







Market Update

While the trend remains firmly negative, as I usually warn, "Wall Street will never make an emerging trend easy for you to hop on", they shake the tree in every which way to throw off the most number of people at any one time, but I have little doubt lower is where we are headed, yet I do believe we'll have some continued near term price volatility.

The 30-60 min charts posted this morning of the Index futures are in my opinion the highest probability resolution and that is firmly and clearly down, but in near term trade, I think we se some bouncing about, especially in the IWM/Russell 2000.

I wish I could demonstrate using the Index futures as it would be much faster, but they are pretty negative for the moment so I'll cover a few near term timeframes in the averages that suggest some price volatility, it's not anything I personally would chase or try to trade, I'd be aligned with highest probabilities as I am and as you can see in this post from this morning...Opening Indications

I'd use any price volatility I could to my advantage, such as a pop or bounce in Financials to short in to, but I'll do my best to keep you up to date with confirmation.

I still haven't gotten to Leading Indicators yet, so I'm sure they'll provide more color, but I don't think anything will change the big picture implications which are firmly negative.




 SPY intraday negative and in line on the downside-1 min

The 3 min SPY shows a clear negative, but on the downside there's a small positive divegrence building, I suspect it needs more work and a wider base to do much. Remember, when volatility increases, so do the chances of short term/small/weak divergence getting run over.

 QQQ 3 min showing both the negative leading and a small positive to the far right which I think needs to come down again to at least the white trendline before it is of any use for an upside bounce and even that, as I said, I believe just to be volatility in price to shakeout trades from the larger trend.

 IWM 1 min negative and in line on the downside today...

IWM 2 min negative with a small positive divegrence building.

This is partly the market's way of working off potential oversold conditions and Wall Street's way of keeping everyone in limbo, unable to hold positions as they are shaken and stopped out. Go with the longer term / big picture trend and avoid being shaken out.

XLF (short) / FAZ (long)

As you probably know, FAZ is one of my personal positions (long) which is a 3x inverse ETF or 3X short Financials ETF), I have liked it for some time and I have held it, despite drawdown because I believe it will bring a much larger return on a downside move in financials, in other words, at this point in the market, I'm less interested in trading around smaller moves and more interested in making sure my positions are aligned with the large picture signals  and can weather any short term drawdown as I have said before,  at this point in the market, the signals are so extreme we are literally off the chart or in uncharted waters, which is exactly the opportunity I have long felt this market was building up to, an opportunity that no one alive has seen so long as you are on the right side of the trade/market. 

This isn't based on opinion although I do have opinions about the unbelievable Central banks actions that have brought us to the edge of this cliff and I'm far from the only one.


When the Bank for International Settlements (the Central Banks' bank) says in their annual report,


"it is hard to avoid the sense of a puzzling disconnect between the markets’ buoyancy and underlying economic developments globally", with additional comments about the "World's leading central bank" (I wonder who that could be?) and the BIS's belief that their balance sheet is so overextended, that this central bank likely lacks the ability to respond  to EVEN A GARDEN VARIETY RECESSION".


 ...and in the most recent quarterly update today, in talking about Central banks and their effect on the fragility of the markets, 


"The highly abnormal is becoming uncomfortably normal. "


In any case I wish I could have gotten this update out sooner after the initial warning today, Quick Head's Up XLF / FAZ , however this is all just an extension of the ongoing analysis , especially of the last couple of weeks with another strong warning this last Friday, Index Futures Like Last Week  as well as, 30-year - 2 year Yield Curve Flatter than when Lehman Failed and Daily Wrap all from last Friday warning today was coming and looking a lot like last Friday, the 28th of November with Important Intraday Update , CHANGES IN CHARACTER LEAD TO CHANGES IN TRENDS also from 11/28 and the following Sunday's Index Futures that continued Friday's very ugly charts on Sunday November 30th with Sunday Night Index Futures  and more specifically, my continued belief in Financials short / FAZ (3x short Financials) long, such as last Friday (December 5th's), Still Like FAZ (3x short Financials) as XLF looks to give up gains.

Hopefully you were able to take advantage of all of this and specifically FAZ which has been called out numerous times recently.

As for the charts that prompted today's earlier Quick Head's Up XLF / FAZ at 1:09 p.m.

*There are a lot of charts below, the larger point is despite my distaste for chasing any trade, I think XLF is well with in a very reasonable area for a longer term position (short) and while I think there's a time and a place for trading, the last few weeks with all indications as weak as they have been and such slight moves in the market, for example as of today the last 2 trading week in the SPX have yield a total move of -0.39%, THIS HAS NOT BEEN THE KIND OF VOLATILITY THAT LENDS ITSELF TO TRADING SHORT TERM AND ESPECIALLY NOT WHEN THE MARKET LOOKS THIS BAD AND IS THIS FAR OFF THE CHART SO TO SPEAK

XLF...
 This is today's intraday 1 min chart that was one of the charts that led me to post the quick "Head's Up" at 1:09 today, well before it saw downside off intraday highs...

 The larger 1 min chart with Friday's weakness that was warned of in so many posts and assets which all looked like today would be similar to last Monday as the signals from the previous Friday and Sunday night's open of futures were very similar to this past Friday and last night's open of futures trade.

 The 3 min chart has seen clear migration of the divegrence as it has gained in strength (negative/distribution) and moved to longer term charts, this one leading negative in to last week.

 Along with a closer view of the 3 min from last Friday's leading negative divegrence (Black Friday-a day I thought the market might be calm and quiet , but was anything but), which led to a short term flameout on the downside with a parabolic drop on volume, creating a short term oversold condition which was easily identifiable by 10:30 a.m. which caused us to call for an oversold bounce, which has been this flag-like price pattern I was talking about earlier.

 The 5 min XLF chart showing accumulation at the October lows as well as distribution in to the stage 3 top and along the lines of the "Igloo with a Chimney" type price pattern top, the chimney representing  a head fake/false breakout, above the yellow line or rounding top- almost always seen before a major reversal in any asset and any time frame.

 The XLF 10 min intermediate chart showing accumulation for the upside move we called in to the October lows as well as distribution in to a stage 3 top for the October cycle and the head fake move with a deepening divergence/distribution.

 I haven't marked the divergences on this very powerful underlying trade 60 min chart because I believe they are obvious enough, but I did mark the area of price in which distribution set in the strongest and I'd make note of where 3C is now relative to price and where it was at any relative point in the past relative to price.

 And the very strong, long term 2 hour chart showing the September distribution leading to the October lows and the accumulation seen almost 2 weeks in advance, although people were so bearish few could imagine the market under accumulation for a strong bounce.

This also covers the 3C concept of price exceeding the area in which the divergence was first seen represented by the yellow line so even if you had gone long this early before the October lows were put in, price almost always far exceeds the area in which the first divegrence showed up, thus those who couldn't possibly believe there was accumulation and signs of such a strong rally that early in October as the market was that bearish, you can see clearly 3C was not only correct long before anyone could identify the same, but also would have produced a profitable trade even at the first site of the divergence.


Since I've covered multiple timeframe analysis above...
 This is a quick look at multiple asset confirmation using FAS (3x long Financials) and FAZ (3x short financials), FAS above should give the same or similar signals as XLF and FAZ should be the exact opposite.

As you can see as of this capture, FAS was showing distribution today with XLF which is the reason I put out the 1:09 p.m. heads up for Financials.

The green arrow just shows 3C confirming the price trend which bounced off Friday's close yet remains intraday leading negative.


 FAZ 2 min with a strong leading positive divegrence (accumulation) intraday today, confirmation.

FAS 3 min leading negative both Friday and today, with more distribution today at a new leading negative low for the two days.

FAS 5 min trend showing distribution through the week of Black Friday which we expected to be up as consumer sentiment was already horrible and the market declining would have caused it to be worse the same week of the busiest shopping day of the year when many retailers move from red for the year to black). Then Monday's oversold market decline and the expected bounce off the oversold condition along with an increasingly negative leading 3C divegrence in to late last week just like the previous week/Friday.

The 30 min FAZ chart has a clear divergence going from in line or downside trend confirmation to a clear, very strong leading positive divegrence,  thus "Changes in Character Lead to Changes in Trend". This is certainly a huge change in character.

And FAS (3x long Financials) 4 hour chart showing the strong distribution in to the September high(head fake move on the August cycle's rounding top) ;leading to the very bearish October lows where there's a relative positive divegrence/accumulation leading to the current move which is FAR, from in line and deeply leading negative.

Lots of confirmation for short XLF/long FAZ of SKF.