Monday, January 6, 2014

Daily Wrap

If you read the "Week Ahead post" and basically had an idea of what short term market expectations were/are as posted Friday here and then for what comes next, then today's Market update in to the close is not far off at all. I was wondering if there's be much of a difference between the charts of today's last market update (as they were collected 30-45 minutes before the close) and the closing charts, I'm glad to say there weren't any differences that were counter to expectations.

Just so you know, despite the SPX having the WORST start of the year in NINE YEARS, the short term trend we prepared for Thursday and Friday which is linked above and essentially confirmed in the "Week Ahead" post (also linked above) was for the market to pick up this morning where 3C left off Friday, that was with intraday negative divergences and the concept dod not disappoint today.

I thought that this initial negative trade in to the first half of the day as expected in to the close Friday and last night, would give way to a more positive trend during the second half of the day as summed up  Friday in this post which is very clear about short term expectations (and I mean short term as in short duration). Those charts are very clear, they suggest a short duration bounce which we prepared for by opening some call positions, some leveraged short gold trades and some long positions. I did not close shorts in the trading portfolio, but rather hedged them with the longs mentioned above.

There's a reason for doing this and that's the AAPL effect, when things get this ugly, this fast, it doesn't take much to create a panic and since the bulk of the carry trade seems to still be open, it doesn't take much to create a panic when you're operating at 100:1 leverage, so I wanted to make sure that short exposure was intact not only for longer term core positions, but even for the trading portfolio which is much more nimble.

My end of day Market Update today essentially said the expectations are still the same for a short duration bounce and the following trend to be extremely ugly on the downside, just the timeframe was stretched by what will probably be half a day.  The reasons for the expectation of a bounce can be found using the link just above, the trend following that expectation can easily be summed up with a single chart although there are plenty more, the SPY 15  or 30 min which I mention because I showed them several times.

Just going by multiple timeframe analysis of the SPY alone, we can sum up expectations and therefore prepare for them as we already have in the case of the first one.

 This shows the 1 min SPY and the very negative divegrence in to the close which carried on today as soon as the market opened. *The Index futures intraday 1 min charts were very similar.

There was resistance around 2:45 as the averages pulled up to Friday's close and then a pullback, which I mentioned earlier today, is likely just a move toward the intraday lows before the first move gets under way.

Leading indicators as posted at the EOD today seemed to confirm that, I checked them after the close and they still do.

The SPY 3 min chart shows another reason why I have short term expectations for a bounce and also why it's of short duration. This is a decent positive divegrence, but only out to a 3 min chart (or 5 min in the Index Futures) and it's really not much more than 2-2.5 days, so again the simple concept of, "You can only go as far as the amount of gas you put in the tank" applies.

The SPY 15/30 min charts as I pointed out are seeing the worst leading negative divegrence since WELL before early October, in fact probably the worst of the year. In one post I showed how the first half of that leading negative 30 min move took 4 days and the second half at the red arrow took a single day, that's a lot of underlying movement for such a long term chart, they don't usually move that fast.

You can see as well that we have a little consolidation in 3C right now, that makes sense if we are expecting a bounce of some sort which I am as evidenced by the positions opened Friday and even today, but the damage is done and I suspect it gets much worse in to any upside. I don't think the worst start in 9 years for the SPX and this divergence are separate events.

Interestingly, considering expectations and the fact expectations are running about 3 hours behind, today's Dominant Price/Volume Relationship was not only dominant among each average, but the same among all averages and fits perfectly with expectations as the P/V relationship today broke down like this.

ALL Averages closed with a Dominant Price / Volume Relationship of Close Down/Volume Up. This relationship suggests that we have reached a short term oversold event, it's similar to a Morning Doji Star Candlestick on heavy volume (high probability short term bullish reversal).

The Dow had 18 of 30, the NASDAQ 100, 66, the Russell 2000 had 806, the SPX had 292 so it was a dominant theme and fits well with the general analysis as well as today's update to the timing.

There were some candlesticks that didn't have that same continuity and made the averages look displaced from each other and without knowing the Dominant P/V, I might be concerned about that situation, but as it were, I am not. For instance, the IWM's closing candle was a bearish Engulfing candle on significant volume while the QQQ formed a near perfect bullish Hammer (bullish reversal candle), the lower wick was just a bit short compared to the real body, but again it's the psychology and concept these patterns represent, so they don't have to look like the text book, so long as you understand the psychology of what they represent and in this case, the Price/Volume relationship is right on track with a candle like the NDX/QQQ, .in fact it is exactly what I'd expect to see.

Well over a week ago I mentioned several things we need to keep an eye on, one was the Carry trades and the Yen, we've already seen divergences that confirm the cover of the carry and then we got real news that BofA covered their USD/JPY cover which is not like a GS rec'd, this is a fact we can prove by their SEC filings.

All of the Carry trades, as mentioned last night are getting ugly, some of the biggest downside moves they've seen that are not like formed slight pullbacks.

Also the market is losing its correlation with these pairs.
Some look worse than this chart of the USD/JPY vs ES (purple). In fact, instead of the carry leading the market, it's as if the market is leading the carry which is interesting because it's EXACTLY what I addressed last night in saying that the typical leverage on a carry trade is at least 10:1 and frequently 100:1, sometimes even higher so a simple 1 pip move that you wouldn't even notice can completely ruin a fund managers day and this can create that panic I mentioned.

This may also be why it see,s the carry cross is following the market rather than leading it. There seems to be a much greater correlation to the Yen, go straight to the source as I also said last night as the Yen (at least with 3C) will reflect underlying trade long before it shows up in the carry cross's price action.

That being said about the carry pairs, they do look to be in a slightly oversold state so a bounce would not be surprising which may be just enough to give the market enough room for its own bounce. This gets to be one of the trickier areas of the market when such fundamental base investments such as carry trades all of the sudden become a large liability, they can effect the market in dramatic ways very quickly because of the kind of leverage attached to them, so it's not a market environment we get to see very often, but it is interesting, it's challenging and if played right, it can not only be navigated, but very profitably navigated.

As for futures right now, intraday 1 min are largely positive, only NQ looks different and a bit shaky, but it's always the 5 min charts that I'm most interested in as far as short term trends and holding up overnight. We have the 5 min positives in the Index futures which is a big part of the analysis and short term positioning including hedging. I think not only will the Yen be interesting to pay attention too, but short term VIX futures and VXX will be key to timing this market and the first trend as well as subsequent ones.

If anything changes dramatically tonight, I'll let you know, but once we have a 5 min Index Futures divergence locked in, it's pretty rare for it not to play out and we are well positioned for that.



In fact... Last night I showed the Yen 5 min chart and while not looking horrible with a nasty negative distribution, there is a relative negative on the 5 min chart (confirming the 5 min Index futures) that looks like the Yen could get a little breather, I also posted the stronger/longer charts like 30 min that show the move higher in the Yen appears to be just starting, this would fit with trend expectations of a short duration bounce followed by something much nastier. Although that doesn't translate instantly over to the Nikkei 225 futures, I would and did take a look and found they look ready for a short duration bounce as well, however their longer, more serious charts which would be the next trend in multiple timeframe analysis are solidly negative which confirms so much from the averages to US Index Futures to credit, Leading indicators, currencies, etc.

As mentioned I double checked Leading Indicators after the close to make sure nothing was out of line with today's market analysis and the only changes I found actually made today's market analysis all the more probable.

For instance, as the market sold off a bit after hitting resistance at Friday's close, HYG (High Yield Corporate Credit) which is most often used for short term manipulation of the market, actually went nearly vertical. The arbitrage effect of HYG is based on its price, not underlying action and the underlying action shows significant distribution.

As you saw in the Market Update from today that included Leading Indicators,  regular High Yield Credit which has no correlation to any arbitrage or manipulation scheme showed an excellent short term positive divegrence suggesting the market bounce we prepared for, however if you look at the rest of the analysis on HY Credit,you'll see that's one piece of the analysis, the smallest and the rest of it is quite ugly for the market so again keep in mind multiple timeframe analysis and the multiple trends it represents, so as far as our expectations, HY Credit is right in line with all of them.

Another thing I found very interesting was the severe underperformance of VXX (short term VIX futures) locally, this is a correlated arbitrage asset like HYG, it just needs to move in the opposite direction to support the market (weak).

The VXX is in blue, the SPX in green, I inverted the SPX's price so you can see what the relative performance is like. Typically there's a 1.0 correlation, although inverse, which means when the SPX's price is inverted like this, the natural correlation would see both assets move in tandem. Today however, you can see severe underperformance in VXX which may be a shift of funds for a market move just as we might do or it could be manipulation of the asset as to activate the arbitrage mechanism and provide the market positive support.

In any case, I haven't seen relative performance this poor in a while.

Yields are an excellent leading indicator, however what I found was they offer no direction as they are in line with the SPX, they (both assets) have reverted to the mean, this means Yields won't help or drag the SPX lower as they stand, however if thy keep moving lower as they have been and the SPX does bounce, then they would be exerting bearish pressure on the market once it bounces.

Sentiment also is a nice Leading Indicator, the longer or stronger charts are clearly negative, the intraday charts are quite boring with almost no discernible trend and that's not to say they are in line with the SPX, they just seem to offer no support right now, nor are they heading straight down. My interpretation of these are they are not going to take the chance and go positive (pros buying short term) because of the risk, the same reason I hedged the trading shorts rather than closed them and they are not headed straight down as I suspect they expect the same as us, a short term bounce. We'll likely know if this opinion is correct if we see them turn clearly down on any market price strength, no matter how short (well at least 3/4's of a day).

Other than that, there's not much to go over that wouldn't be repetitious. However I did want to show several assets we are involved with and/or may be involved with.

 While I really like the longer term charts of the precious metals, especially gold like SLV's 60 min above showing a clear base with accumulation and a leading positive divegrence, in the near term as they have been trading opposite the market, I chose to open a short term trading options position here with SLV February $20 Puts just Friday.

 The intraday charts look like this will be a successful trade as the 2 min is clearly negative at this island-type area...

And the 10 min has less detail, but a clean overall negative signal. I think once SLV pulls back a bit, it will make for a very strong trending long position as I expect it to break out of the stage 1 base and move to mark-up soon, but for now, I choose to play it short with puts and everything looks great.

While we're on precious metals, I needed a hedge for the trading portfolio which is equities (ETFs) only so while options would have been most effective, I chose to set up this portfolio using equities only, I needed something that would move opposite the market and hedge the short positions, but also had some leverage so I chose Gold/GLD as the underlying asset and the 3x leveraged short, DGLD as the trade.
 Using the multiple timeframe/multiple trend analysis concept, the 3 min chart for GLD has a VERY clear leading negative divegrence so the long DGLD should do great, but like SLV, the larger, longer trend trade is GLD long once it pulls back a little (again it tends to trade opposite the market).

At the 15 min chart we can clearly see the base or the most recent part of the base with a strong leading positive divegrence and to the right, a small relative negative that suggests a halt and correction, so DGLD should work great and after we take profits there (hopefully,  I think we have more evidence than just to hope), we should be setting up for a long GLD trade that's ready to move from stage 1 to stage 2 and again, the asset trades opposite the market so a move up to stage 2 (mark up) in GLD should lead to the SPX moving to stage 4 (Decline), the last stage in the cycle, also known as a bear market.

I also chose an AAPL long as a hedge for the shorts in the trading portfolio as well as an AAPL Feb. $560 call which could work as a hedge as well, I just don't allow it in the trading portfolio. The reason I chose AAPL (equity long) for a hedge was not because of its beta or leverage, in fact I was disappointed that AAPL was the best I could find at the time and that's the reason I chose AAPL, it was by far, the best looking long at the time which was Thursday and Friday. Even today, the industry groups like XLF (Financials) and XLK (Tech) do not look good therefore I could not choose their leveraged ETFs as a hedge because they really look like they'll be lucky to float with the market, in fact although I don't expect it because of the market's pull, I would not be surprised if TECH and Financials were down even during a market move higher.
 I used AAPL the same way as a 1-day long to hedge the trading portfolio and it worked perfectly, it not only protected the portfolio from any draw down, it even added some overall gains during that day due to the hedge being the right size.

Here the 5 min chart shows a leading positive divegrence so both the AAPL long equity position and the AAPL February $560 call should make money. In addition to the beautiful 5 min leading positive 3C signal, today also gave us a head fake move which was effective as volume swelled as stops were likely run right through on the open as well as the odd short here and there.

Before this position and the last hedge from last week, I have stayed away from AAPL for months because there has been an excellent looking 15 min negative divegrence, but the 30 and 60 min charts were perfectly in line with price, therefore where the probabilities are highest, a short would have been dangerous and a long would have been foolish with that 15 min negative.

I was correct to stay away from AAPL as it hasn't done anything in about 5 weeks, but this 30 min chart shows a significant change in character as it finally broke away from trend confirmation and started leading negative in a big way.

While the short term trade is long AAPL, I feel there's a high probability as we wrap that long position up, we'll have good signals to look at an AAPL short trade.

MCP was entered long today using January $5 Calls
 While MCP is one of my favorite longer term/trending trade possibilities as you can see the most recent portion of a large base in MCP, both the parabolic move and 3C signals told me it was time to take profits in the trading positions, in core longs I left MCP alone, a little, normal correction isn't of much concern, but when you are only running 6 positions in a trading portfolio, opportunity cost becomes an issue so last week we took significant profits on trading longs and will wait for a pullback to re-enter MCP trading longs for the next leg up.

As mentioned, longer term core positions were left as they are as I see no reason to run up transaction costs and maybe miss part of a nice move simply because the asset is likely to undergo a normal, healthy correction.

Very short term today's Jan $5 call was opened as the 3 min chart looks like MCP will see a quick upside pop.

Two things, 1) I used options for the leverage as I see this as a short term move that is not connected to the market and 2) while I'd usually go for February calls (or at least 6 weeks before expiration), I chose the less expensive January because I really think this will be a very short duration upside move and wanted to get the most bang for the buck.

"IF" MCP drops below the $5.67 level tomorrow, I'll double check it to make sure it's a head fake move (as I expected one today) and if so, I'd add the second half of the position entered today to bring it to full size.

DGAZ is a long position which is a 3x inverse Natural Gas pullback play on another one of my long time (long) favorites, UNG.
 UNG 30 min shows stage 1 accumulation (white), stage 2 mark up (green) and stage 3 distribution (red) and all of this is very low in a much larger stage 1 base. So I love UNG as a long term trending/core position, but as a trade, I believe it will pullback as the 30 min chart and others suggest.

DGAZ is the 3x leveraged, near mirror opposite of UNG and I chose this as a long trade on a UNG pullback for the trading portfolio. You can see the opposite signals on DGAZ's 30 min chart.

The actual base in white or for UNG, toppy area in red, look like it could see more short term chop, but I think there's a clean trend once there's a breakout or in UNG's case a pullback below the toppy area.

So DGAZ is not a position I worry about from day to day, as long as the signals are there, I'm patient with it because I think it will deliver a superior gain with its 3x leverage.

However I chose to leave the trending/core UNG long positions open and would consider either adding to UNG on a pullback or opening a new long trading position, but until then, I'm patient and confident in DGAZ for a trade somewhere along the lines of a swing trade, maybe a bit longer.

Although we just got out of TWTR short (entry on December 26th and covered the short on December 30) I feel pretty good that we'll have another crack at it. I believe TWTR was downgraded this morning, thus the gap down and it traded in what some might call a small bear flag. The thing I noticed was the 1-5 min charts were all in line with price, not seeing additional distribution, so it may fill the gap or it may even make some sort of head fake move higher, but we have 3C signals on it that are showing larger distribution. When we entered TWTR for our first trade there it was 100% based on our concepts regarding parabolic price moves, we got in at nearly the top and exited as it was just about at its lows for a nice little trade, but now we have 3C signals so this is one that's hot on the radar.

TBT long (2x leveraged short 20+ year treasuries) is another shorter term position we entered today, if TBT will pullback toward today's intraday low, I'd be very likely to add to the TBT long and/or consider perhaps a TLT Put. That being said, I was just talking last night about a pullback in the long, unleveraged version of TBT, TLT, which has been on the radar a long time. It now is looking like it's preparing for a set-up and move so the pullback in TLT is welcomed as I'd like to enter TLT long (I'll likely short TBT to get the 2x leverage), but until then, TBT looks like a decent play on a TLT pullback.

There are quite a few others I'll be covering likely tomorrow including PCLN and NFLX.

I feel good about our take on the market, the management of positions and the set up of portfolios for multiple trends while also respecting the possibility of a black swan event as it is rising.











Important Update

Well once again, the lesson that keeps popping up,

"Whatever you think is reasonable as far as a target goes or a time period goes, DOUBLE or TRIPLE IT!"

It's very easy to look at the market with a reasonable view and come up with your forecast, but the market is the furthest destination in the world from, "REASONABLE".


In any case, I don't see much that has changed in the expectations for what the market will do, however the intraday details as always are difficult.

The one thing we do want to be very aware of is the fact that there has been such rapid and very strong deterioration ever since the new year started, it could at just about any time roll over even the best confirmed probabilities as it occurred off AAPL's highs which I mention often because it was a painful lesson, missing 390 points trying to chase 10.

Here's basically what we have, it looks to be like divergences are still being put together, but not based on the period that led to last week's analysis and positioning (long positions to hedge the trading shorts and to make some extra $), based on the period that started late Friday afternoon in which despite price, 3C went negative intraday which led to the correct assumption, that 3C would pick up today right where it left off Friday (which is why I expected the first half of today to trade in negative territory and the second half to move towards the short term positives that were the reason for adding those late week long hedges). 

I don't think there's any reason to abandon positions already started late last week and today, nor do I think there's enough evidence to add to those positions beyond a hedge and have a forward leaning portfolio that is biased to the long side. Everything looks as it should, just longer and more noise as is typically the case.

Just from an intraday perspective of the averages and the Index Futures, here's what we are looking at...
 IWM looks the worst, the 2 min chart does however show 2 areas of accumulation that are likely to melt in to 1 larger "W", but the danger here is that a slightly deeper pullback to create that typical pattern, could easily fall out of hand and run over current signals, IT DEPENDS LARGELY ON HOW THE CARRY POSITIONS PERFORM AND WHETHER A LEVERAGED PANIC IS CREATED.

 3 MIN ALSO 2 AREAS OF POSITIVE AND A HEAD FAKE.

10 min shows why the expected move is considered "Short duration long", this is a lot of damage in a short span of time.

Q's intraday positive

2 min chart is adding more 3C momentum as is normal

3 min chart is really adding momentum so I wonder if we'll get a full pullback to the intraday lows of today, if so and divergences continue as they are, it should be a fast, strong little bounce and our longs should perform well.

At 10 mins, the larger perspective is quite clear.

 SPY 1 min looks like a little backing and filling is likely, this fits with the TICK data as it was captured.

3 min SPY leading positive on a head fake move today.

Again, while some details and timing are different than expectations, the general tone or story is the same.

10 min with some positive signals, resistance in most of the averages today at Friday's close.

SPY 15 and 30 min and there are 60 min charts that all have this VERY quick, very strong leading negative divegrence, that's fast distribution.

TF/R2K futures like IWM are the weakest of all on a relative basis, but the 1 min is stronger and the 5 min is improving.

NQ/NDX 5 min are certainly improving and validate the expectations from last week as well as the ones from Friday's closing 3C action.

ES 5 min has a solid divergence and a head fake move which is a timing flag for us, so based on this alone, out positions should do well.

This is the intraday TICK I mentioned. It was tame today, then steadily moved higher until hitting a +1550 reading, extreme and strong, then you see more of a consolidation as price and 3C intraday show.


 HYG as a manipulative (short term ) asset (HY corp credit) is consolidating intraday

 but short term it has enough in the intraday charts to suggest it is being used as an arbitrage asset for the short duration long in which positions were set up for Today and Friday.

This is the bigger picture and only intermediate, it gets worse further out for HYG, so I'm not concerned about the market putting in another year or 6 months or even a month of upside, I think the big-boned lady has sung a beautiful, but slightly dark song.

 VIX short term futures have been an intraday impediment to opening new positions, they need to move negative and they are slightly positive, which I say because it's only a 1 min chart.

 At 5 mins there's a small leading negative.

This all fits, it's not so negative as to suggest a big market move that changes anything, but it's  enough for the short duration move and I think our recent positioning is perfect in size, asset type and scope to handle hedging and adding gains on this move.

HYG v SPX intraday is clearly leading the SPX, this makes sense given the 3C charts and our expectations, however


 While HYG is leading (at the white arrow) it is within a larger negative so if we were to say, "What does this represent in terms of trend or Dow Theory", I'd say,

"It means that the sub-intermediate trend is down  (based on signals) or going down, the short term trend is up. If we were playing rock, paper , scissors, the short term positive is going to get beat every time as if it were paper and the red box were scissors"

THIS IS MULTIPLE TIMEFRAME ANALYSIS IN PRACTICE AND AT ITS BEST

High Yield Credit v. the SPX is showing a positive character, especially on today's head fake move in the SPX. If HY credit were actually 3C in this same configuration, it would be telling us that there has been accumulation building for a move (as is the truth) and today's head fake movve in SPX created a stronger accumulation signal which is one of the major reasons head fake moves exist and why they are such good timing markers".

However once again, looking even at a sub-intermediate chart of the same, High Yield Credit has ran the other way. On even longer term charts, HY credit is even worse.

Credit has been one of our best leading indicators and we are again using it in multiple timeframe analysis, it says the same as everything else, "Short term bounce", but it will be sold and the next leg lower will follow.

The unique part of the situation is the next leg lower is not likely to be the typical small consolidation or even a deeper 10% correction, in fact, I don't think the next leg will be corrective at all, I think it will be a definitive trend change. The arrows show the short term multiple timeframe analysis, the red box shows the bigger picture, both are true at the same time, it all depends on which you trade.

I think a lot of traders' greatest challenge is fitting their trade to the timeframe or timeframe on which they've had an insight. For instance, to open a Trend Trade long and manage it in such fashion will create a losing trade, even if you were right about the initial bounce.

Opening a short term swing trade long for the next day or few days, will also be a losing trade. You must fit the trade to the timeframe and trend, otherwise you can be right all day long about the moves coming, BUT USE THE WRONG TOOL FOR THE JOB AND MESS IT UP BADLY.

VXX (SHORT TERM VIX FUTURES) SHOWS AGAIN THE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR IN VXX AT THE WHITE ARROW VS THE SPX (SPX PRICE IN GREEN IS INVERTED SO YOU CAN SEE HOW VXX IS PERFORMING VS ITS NATURAL CORRELATION WHICH IS 1.0)

 I have said Gold is a good inverse asset to follow as it has been trading the opposite of the market for some time. If I only had gold as an indication, I'd feel good that I had a strong idea of what's coming, this is why I opened a leveraged gold short Friday for a short term position (thus the need for leverage), that was DGLD.

GLD intraday is clearly shifting negative, if price follows 3C's signal, then GLD moves down near term, the market moves up and DGLD moves up and makes money.

I had many other timeframes, but there's no need, they are consistent. The 5 min above is showing a strong leading negative signal, all of that happened today and there's a rounding reversal area in place.

Even the 10 min chart is leading negative, all of that in one day, so as I suspected, the intraday action early today would be negative. I expected though that since we usually have 2-3 trends within a day, that we'd move back toward the market positive that was interrupted on Friday's last hour of closing activity.

While I was wrong on the timing of the second short term trend (correct on the first as trade picked up right where 3C left off on Friday) expected to occur today, THE EVIDENCE THAT THIS SECOND TREND IS COMING AND IN FACT VERY CLOSE , IS RIGHT ABOVE IN THAT GLD'S 10 MIN CHART IS LEADING NEGATIVE (remember the market tends to trade opposite GLD and remember Friday we opened a DGLDD - leveraged gold short) to take advantage of what we saw Friday which is even more clear today on a strong 10 min intraday leading negative move in GLD.


I put all of these charts together before the close so I want to check on them as of the close, but I don't think anything significant could happen in that time. I did say I expected a little larger "W" and that meant price in the averages needed to pullback a bit, so far that's what we have on the close. For the most part, the averages pulled back very close to the area expected as I began this post.

I think the charts above are solid and I'll find that the last 30 mins or so didn't change anything, except bring us closer to the next trend.



Trade Idea: TLT / TBT (long)

As I explained last night in the "Week Ahead" post and as you probably know, I've been talking about TLT on and off for months, probably the better part of 2013 with a couple of small trades here and there and one open TBT long in the core positions which is at a decent gain, but big picture counter trend, a play on a TLT pullback which has worked fairly well so far.

Last night I said I thought the TLT trade is no longer theoretical, but now moving to a more actionable area and deserves attention now.

I wanted to see a pullback in TLT and I think we get it near term which should set up a long TLT position which will be executed by shorting TBT (the 2x leveraged inverse of TLT) to create a 2x leveraged TLT long.

However first, I'm looking for a TLT pullback which means TBT (it's 2x leveraged inverse or short 20+ year treasuries), looks actionable now.

 This is the big picture in TLT as I suspect there will be a rotation (there's evidence already of one) out of stocks and in to bonds. The exact reasoning I'm not sure of, whether a flight to safety driven largely by long only funds seeking some shelter from a market decline or perhaps the limited availability of the asset as the F_E_D owns a large portion of these and they are high quality collateral for banks. With the Treasury slowing their auctions for Treasuries this year, it may be an issue of tighter supply conditions.

 For the moment though I'm still looking for that TLT pullback as mentioned last night and this leading positive 2 min TBT suggests that's what's happening.

We have excellent migration that has set in very fast on the 3 min TBT chart, it's leading even more right now as it is moving fast.

I'm okay with a full size TBT long here, but there is a good possibility that TBT pulls back to for a wider reversal process, maybe a "W" or even a new low on a double bottom here (we'd essentially be at the top of the middle of a "W" base right now).

So I'll be adding TBT long, I think it has the potential to be a swing trade, although the evidence for that is not in place yet and would require a deeper pullback or a larger base.

If you are interested, but want to look at this in a higher probability way and don't mind possibly missing the trade (which I think is the smartest route to take), then set price alerts for a pullback at least to today's intraday lows or in the area and a few just under them.


Trade Idea: MCP January $5 Calls

I'm going to go ahead with a partial position in MCP January (monthly) $5 calls, this will be a half position, until/unless MCP breaks below $4.67 which is not out of the question, given the NYSE TICK data, I'd put the probability at 65%. If that happens, then I'd add the other half.

Typically I'd go at least 6 weeks out on the expiration, but because I feel this is a very short duration move, I'm going with January.

Take a look at TLT which I mentioned in the context of the longer term last night and TBT long in the context of the near term TLT movement.

I think TBT long is a workable (2x leveraged Short 20+ year or 2x leveraged short TLT) position as well.

I'll feature that in a moment.

As for MCP, TICK data does look like a pullback broadly across the market is pretty likely intraday, but I believe to set up a larger positive divegrence intraday which had been negative as of Friday's close and carried through to this morning, this is now shifting toward our slightly longer weekly view of probabilities as prepared for late last week.

MCP...
 The intraday 3 min chart looks better and better which is migration of a shorter divergence moving in to longer timeframes.

The range is often a dead give-away as well.

This 1 min intraday chart is in line, but it would not be unusual to see a double head fake move and MCP make a move below $4.67, which is where the initial trade looked appealing, in this case I'd likely use that as an add to and fill out the options position.



Market Update

It's looking like we are on track, moving from early weakness to the anticipated later strength that should set the move to the upside in motion.

Index futures look good, the 1 min has joined the 5 min charts, in some cases though like TF, they are still weak, on its own, I wouldn't call for a market bounce, but taken together, the composite as you saw Friday, has strong enough confirmation that the trades entered late last week remain open.

As for adding to positions, that's a personal choice depending on your time, your trading style, your risk tolerance, etc.

For the trading portfolio, the positions entered were the right size to do what they were intended to, hedge the shorts and make some extra change on the move.

I'm still in the air on MCP, it did make a small stop run and hit some intraday stops, it's not the move I had hoped to see, but the day's not over.
The trade has goos probabilities for making a move, the question is whether the risk:reward profile makes sense.

I'm going to check some assets and indications to see if the same degree of expected market strength early this week still looks reasonable or if it looks like a weaker case.

For now, I think letting the positions already set work is the best course and any additional positions will depend on the outlook as of today.



MCP Trade Follow Up

There's a fair chance MCP bounces near term, likely later today, however this should be a short term bounce. I don't think the trade makes much sense without leverage which means call options, but it may make some sense if you have the ability to watch over it and act quickly.

MCP tends to trade on its own, meaning it's not subject (as most stocks are) to the, "Rising tide lifts all boats" market influence or gravitational pull. So even though we are expecting a market bounce, a MCP bounce would likely be a separate event that is unrelated to the magnetic pull of the market, which also means any move to the upside may be significantly shorter in duration.

While this is looking higher and higher probability, it is still a small move and thus is a very speculative trade.

 The main short term theme in MCP has been and still is a pullback. I'm not interested in trying to trade the pullback as MCP is otherwise a very strong stock and I'm not betting against probabilities.

For most people, except the most aggressive traders, the most sensible trade is to either leave MCP in place as a core or trending long position and chalk a pullback up to a "NORMAL", healthy correction or for traders, to exit it as I have in the trading portfolio, look for the end of the pullback, confirm accumulation in to the pullback and enter MCP again on the long side for the next leg higher.

 That being said, intraday we have a small range that looks like a bearish descening triangle, this "may" be random or it may be intentional as a head fake move. Being MCP was just featured last week on fast money, I'm guessing it is intentional and therefore a head fake move would make this trade much more attractive.

 There's migration of the divergence as you see on the 2 min chart above

As well as the 3 min chart above

and the 5 min chart above.

When I say a "Head Fake move of the descending (bearish) triangle would make the trade more attractive" this is what I mean.

I only propose this because MCP is on traders' radar because of the Fast Money CNBC piece. The descending triangle is considered a bearish consolidation / continuation pattern so most technical traders will take action as a short (short term at theat) if MCP breaks below the triangle (as retail technical traders always want price confirmation first) which should send volume up. They'd be expecting such a move which may draw in some sellers or shorts, then the move reverses to the upside, putting those shorts at a loss, causing the stopped out longs to get greedy and re-enter on the long side and this gives the move some momentum, however it's a true head fake move.

This would be useful to us to create a higher probability trade as the move below the triangle would make for a lower premium on calls (theoretically) and also serve as a reversal/momentum catalyst.

Such a move may make the difference between taking the trade or just letting it go by.

If you are interested, it's important to set price alerts so you know when any such move has occurred, we can check the move quickly for signs of a true head fake in that the move should see positive divergences/accumulation.