I received a couple of emails since Friday based on this sentence from a post yesterday, Friday "My "guesstimate" is that the SPX will likely hit at least > (below) SPX $1525 before the first significant correction." I don't like giving targets unless there's something very clear, I'd rather listen to the message of the market telling us when we are near a target zone. However there are some concepts I follow and have a strong belief in within the realm of "Market Behavior" and that is largely based on how the market knows what technical traders (retail, where they do a great deal of fleecing) are paying attention to, where they will have the strongest reactions. If you had to guess what moving average technical traders pay the most attention to, what do you think it would be? You'd probably answer, "The 50-day/bar moving average" and I'd probably agree with you. However clearly the second most popular would be the average that is used with the 50-day that give us such important Technical Analysis setups such as "The Golden Cross" or the "Death Cross" and that is the 200-day/bar moving average. First this work is based off some one else's initial data that I checked on and worked to find a more accurate method.
This is the original chart and comments
This is the daily SPX with a 200-day ma going back to 1994, the premise was this... "Each time the S&P 500 has traded more than 12% above its 200-day moving-average, the following correction has not ended until the average itself was breached by price action" At the green arrows we see a 12+% move in the SPX above the 200-day m.a., after that there's a move below the 200-day m.a. represented as red on the histogram, sometimes just below the 200, sometimes significantly below. I re-created the code for this to look closer, for me it wasn't at all about a sell signal, it was about the accuracy of a timing. I found the premise held up, especially over a number of years, but there were some areas where the timing was not useful.
The red arrow is 12+% > 200 m.a for the SPX, the white is the piercing of the 200 day m.a., as I said their premise held up, but 2010's and 2011's timing was questionable so I started adding some different indicators and code to see what worked as a good timing trigger, the target seems pretty undeniable, price heads below the 200 ma, sometimes a little, sometimes a lot.
The bottom indicator is just the percent the SPX is above or below the 200 m.a., it would be easier to display in Stockfinder, but take too long to write the code. to the right I have 13% and 0% in red boxes.
Again, 2009-20010 signals did make the move, but not in a timely fashion. After trying quite a few indicators I simply went to the daily version of 3C, this was the first 3C indicator, first used exclusively on daily charts.
I found the signal timing was greatly enhanced if the signal was taken after the SPX was 12% above its 200 m.a. and at the first negative 3C divergence that was stronger than a simple relative divergence. The first red arrow to the far left is a simple relative divergence, the very next is a stronger negative as price is higher and 3C is lower, making it a wider divergence. The other signals are there, but they are bot as sharp on a long scaled out chart like this, so here's a closer look.
After the 2009 and then this 2010 signal, it was the first significant daily negative divergence that sent price below the 200-day.
At 2011, we start with a relative negative DURING the +12% signal, then we have an inline 3C signal as price and 3C make a move higher, it's the first larger negative divergence that acts as the timing call.
2012, the signal of +12% and then the next negative divergence is the timing call.
Here we are now, although we already have negative in place, it's the first signal after the +12% signal in this set of indicators, the first move is not actually a negative divergence, both price and 3C move lower so it is in line, it's the current divergence that is leading negative, so it looks like this +12% signal is close to the timing cue 3C provides. The 200 m.a. has been broken in all the examples on their first chart since 1994, I can't argue with that, so $1525 in my view is the minimum first target. For a whole bevy of reasons I don't think we stop there, I do think we see a countertrend move or consolidation, but it could be 8 or m10% below the 200 before that happens, I'd just say from historical precedent that $<$1525 is at least the first downside target at minimum.
Many of the charts you see here at WOWS are my proprietary indicator 3C which reveals underlying institutional money movements and often contradicts price. To understand the annotations made on charts, you must first understand that 3C has no numerical value, it is a pure divergence indicator. Positive divergences represent accumulation by smart money, negative divergences represent distribution by smart money and when 3C trades with price, that is trend confirmation.
The chart annotation system is simple; white arrows represent relative positive divergences, red arrows represent relative negative divergences and green arrows represent trend confirmation. When 3C is in a white or red box, that represents a leading positive or negative divergence, leading divergences are the most powerful.
We analyse 3C in multiple timeframes, the longer the timeframe the stronger the accumulation. 1-2 min timeframes represent intraday moves, a 5 min timeframe can represent a day or two and 15 min timeframes average trends of a swing trade nature. 30 and 60 min charts can move the market for a month or more and daily charts can be over a year.
You'll get use to seeing the charts and understanding how the multiple timeframe analysis works and works well.
Welcome to Wolf on Wall Street.
The trades featured here are meant to maximize returns with the least risk and highest probabilities. Unless otherwise mentioned, all trades are meant to be executed at market. I prefer long-term trending trades which perform well in rising markets, but really stand out in declining markets. However, we get occasional one day gifts 30,40,60% 1-day gains. I'd urge you to consider taking some or all off the table in such cases, the markets don't give gifts like that often or for very long. Most of the returns that make the system outperform so well come in short-entry trades. If you are opposed to short trades, this is not the system for you, unless you are ok with buying an inverse ETF. If you would like more information about the truth about shorting stocks, just email me.
Risk management. I recommend a specific and consistent risk management approach to all positions. In most cases we try for 2% risk money (2% of portfolio) unless such a position size exceeds 15-20% of overall portfolio in actual position size. Each trader is different and each has a different allowance of open trades. I like to keep the overall money in the trade around 10-15% of portfolio per position in case of gaps against you. Stops are generally executed at the end of day and I personally never place a stop order, all my stops are mental; remember, the middle man gets to see everyone's cards. When you are not in tune with the market or opportunities just aren't that spectacular, I take my risk per position down to 1% or even half a percent of portfolio value.
Each trader is different and must determine their own level of comfort with risk. I do have a channel stop which I provide to TeleChart/StockFinder users for automated stops, I appreciate you using my links to sign up if you do. The Trend Channel catches trends and works well as it automatically adjusts for each stock's volatility. Arbitrary exits based on nervousness about the markets WILL decrease the portfolio performance dramatically. This system will not ever get you in at market bottoms or tops. The recent 1 year performance against the Russell 2k buy and hold had the system beating it by 3:1. Ultimately it is up to you as to how you proceed, but I'm always available to help you determine what might work best for you.
I do use other scans and systems when market conditions warrant their use and may change strategy with market conditions.
The MOST IMPORTANT tool you have to bring you long term success is RISK MANAGEMENT. There are plenty of articles linked at Trade-Guild.net on Risk Management. We can be wrong 75% of the time and still outperform the market with solid, consistent risk management.
Position Sizing
The position sizes noted in the positions @ 2% risk of portfolio are based on a $20,000 portfolio-adjust as needed. Due to tight stops, there is the possibility, even probability that one position could take up the entire portfolio. You need to decide how many positions you want to trade and reduce the position size according to that. For instance, if you want to trade 5 positions in a $20,000 portfolio, no one position should be valued at more than $4,000-not risk money or 2% rule, but share price entry x shares.
Is interest rates about to start going up?
-
Yes, I know - it does not make any sense - FED is about to cut
rates...but....real world interest rates are not always what FED wants it
to be.
Futures Update BR-EXIT Edition
-
So the conventional wisdom couldn't have been more wrong. Those chasing
risk and closing hedges couldn't be in a worse place right now. I would
still remin...
This website may include stock and market analysis. Any opinions, ideas, views and statements expressed here are opinion only, subject to change without notice and for informational purposes only. Trading stocks carries a high degree of risk. It is possible that an investor may lose part or all of their investment. Accuracy and timeliness of any information is not guaranteed and should only be used as a starting point for doing independent additional research allowing the investors to come to his or her own opinion. Nothing on this blog is to be considered a buy, hold or sell recommendation. *Wolf on Wall Street portfolios are PAPER TRADED, no real money is used. Any investments, trades and/or speculations made in light of the opinions, ideas, and/or forecasts expressed or implied herein are committed solely at your own risk, financial or otherwise. Results are dependent on market conditions, timing and trading style. Comments posted on Disqus Threads are not moderated and are not representative of opinions of authors of this site.
Translation: You are responsible for your own investment decisions. Not anyone else. YOU.
Position disclaimer: Authors might OR might not have position/interest in securities mentioned on this site!
Affiliations:
Authors of this blog might receive commissions and other considerations from:
Correspondents' emails are strictly confidential. The third-party advertising placed by ad networks may collect information for ad targeting. Links for commercial sites are paid advertisements. Blog links on the site are posted at my discretion, without compensation of any kind.
No comments:
Post a Comment