Friday, April 13, 2012

ES-S&P E-Mini Futures

As I showed you in the last market updates, I don't believe this market is giving up the ghost just quite yet.

ES has broken with the persistent negative divergence to put in an ever-strengthening positive divergence, now leading.

If you haven't noticed by now, Wall Street sets up cycles, like this cycle bounce up that started Tuesday. Wednesday the market faced significant headwinds and they stepped in to give the bounce support late Wednesday leading to a big move yesterday. It appears that is what is happening again in ES and the other averages. This is all short term divergences while the longer term continues to deteriorate, in essence they are trying to move the market higher to sell in to strength and it's pretty rare that they don't get their way.

I can't say exactly what their target is, however we have already seen distribution in to yesterday's move up, clearly they seem to have their sights set a bit higher and the Chinese data overnight was not helpful, thus some additional short term support.

Market Update

 The DIA is starting to round over here.

 The 1 min positive divergence is a bit stronger as well.

 ES has broken with the persistent negative divergence and seeing a small leading positive divergence, like Wednesday afternoon, it looks like they are stepping in with some support to hold the market up a bit longer.

 The QQQ divergence on the  1 min is starting to lead a bit as well.

 The SPY is rounding over, losing downside momentum. This is probably seen by some bulls as a chance to "Buy the dip".

And the 1 min divergence is improving in the SPY as well.

USO Trade

I took a small position in May $38 calls in USO.

USO Update

Yesterday when I closed the model portfolio (options) calls in USO, I was looking for a place to pick them up again on a pullback. I'm thinking I'll add a small call position in USO in the area.

 1 min positive

 2 min positive

 5 min weak relative positive

15 min still pretty strong.

This trade would most likely be a flip, but I want to look at it now as the dollar is strong, should we get a reversal of that strength in the afternoon, USO should benefit.

Risk Asset Layout Update

The Risk Assets are showing a mixed picture. I found it a little amusing how worked up the talking heads were yesterday, "The biggest two day gain since....", etc. However the truth of the market is it is very weak, volatility is what caused the move to be so large, as we suspected since before the move began.

The Risk Asset Layout is reflecting that, but it is also looking like it is not quite sold on this being the end of the move up, neither am I. If there ever was a time to phase in to short positions, this move would be it.

 High Yield Credit hasn't really sold off with the market as of yet, I would expect HY Credit to sell off before equities before this is all said and done.


 Yields are plunging and that is a sign of the weakness in the market, despite yesterday's gains.

 FXA started to show a small negative divergence with the market yesterday, thus far it is in line this morning.

 We are seeing a strong move in the dollar, shown here with the Euro dropping, this is putting early pressure on the market, much like Wednesday.

 And here is the dollar strength this morning vs the SPX. Typically after the EU close or after 12 pm the dollar weakens a bit and that's when we tend to see the market put in most of it's gains intraday (not including a.m. gaps).

 High Yield Corporate Credit still looks supportive of the market making further gains as it has not sold off yet.

 Sector wise, Financials are starting to show a little better relative momentum vs the SPX.

ES too has put in a small positive divergence, sort of like what we saw late Wednesday.


My gut feeling that AAPL would diverge with the market has held up every day thus far, this I believe is one of the keys to a real reversal.

Early market update

There are several relative positive 1 min divergences so I'm thinking we should see a bottom intraday some time soon, although the deterioration from yesterday is moving in the right direction, I still am not convinced the bounce is over.


 DIA

 The IWM looks the worst...

 QQQ

SPY

I'm going to take a look at the Risk Asset Layout.

Overnight-In to the open

We started off the afterhours session with a GOOG beat, but a dividend that's not really a dividend, but a 2:1 share split for new GOOG non-voting shares that will carry a new ticker. I can't say it hasn't happened before, I'm just not aware of it. I don't see how this is good for GOOG in the long run.

Next up, ES moved up well and saw a little bump as the North Korean rocket fell in to the sea. I do wonder whether all of the deployed Patriot batteries and Aegis anti-missile destroyers, whether Japanese or South Korean had anything to do with the failure or if North Korea will use the two countries as a scapegoat for the failure.

Shortly thereafter as reported last night, Chinese GDP missed, coming in at 8.1 rather than 8.4 with the whisper number being a ridiculous 9.0! I didn't think too much about the China GDP before the number came out because the country's political system is so corrupt that it's hard to trust any economic data coming out of China, which again makes me wonder if the number was actually much worse then the reported 8.1. There have been report of power grabs, attempted coups and uprisings, all sources reporting such have been shut down. China is parciluar in their human rights record, yet their greatest and most feared enemy are the Chinese population themselves. Food inflation is running high, there's a housing bust, and when I do think about what the real Chinese GDP, I merely look at commodities and that tells me all I need to know; it isn't pretty.

Speaking of which, I'm glad I sold my USO calls yesterday upon the first sign of a negative divergence, looking to perhaps re-enter the at a lower price as the Chinese GDP did not help oil's gains overnight; USO is set to open lower.

Moving right along to Europe, the mood there is sour as I predicted weeks ago after months of quiet on the E.U front. We all know that nothing is fixed in the EU and it likely can't be fixed. Greece has a sticky thorn in the side of the EU, the real danger is and has always been Spain, where overnight a report was released showing Spanish bank borrowing from the ECB jumped by 75 bn Euro in one month, this happened last Friday as the market was closed on the NFP print in Italy too, the same amount $75 billion. It's more than obvious that the EU banking sector, particularly in the PIIGS countries in is grave danger.-$75 BILLION in 1 month! For perspective, these are the highest ever month-to month borrowing from the ECB. Yields on 10 year Spanish paper jumped on the report to 5.92%, 6% is the number that sent Greece looking for its first bailout as the yields at that rate are unsustainable. The problem is the EU does not have the "Bazooka" as it has come to be known, to save Spain should they falter. Yields in Italy which have been above 6% in the past and had dropped considerably after the ECB's LTRO are now on the rise again and hit 5.47% overnight.

To make matters worse, news has broken that the ECB is looking to support countries' yields directly through the secondary market rather than lend to banks. It's a reasonable plan from the ECB as LTRO money has not been used to support yields as the ECB had hoped, so they may be cutting off the lifeline that is keeping EU banks alive.Look for absolute carnage in the EU banking sector, not that it hasn't already been underway for the last several weeks.

In the US, JPM beat on headline earnings, however look under the sheets and it's not as pretty as the headline beat would have us assume. The beat can be largely attributed to reduced loan loss reserves and a bevy of one time charge offs-a simple accounting trick banks use to pump up the bottom line, at the same time JPM saw its first increase in non-performing loans in years. How the reduced loan loss reserves squares with a rise in non-performing loans, well there's simply no good answer other than JPM wanted or needed a beat; probably after having issued the recent dividend which in retrospect might look a little irresponsible considering the rising non-performing loans.

This mornings's US CPI looked like this...


Released On 4/13/2012 8:30:00 AM For Mar, 2012
PriorConsensusConsensus RangeActual
CPI - M/M change0.4 %0.3 %0.1 % to 0.5 %0.3 %
CPI - Y/Y change2.9 %
CPI less food & energy0.1 %0.2 %0.1 % to 0.2 %0.2 %
CPI less food & energy - Y/Y change2.3 %


There were no big surprises there, however as noted in the report,

"The indexes for food, energy, and all items less food and energy all increased in March. The gasoline index continued to rise, more than offsetting a decline in the household energy index and leading to a 0.9 percent increase in the energy index. The food index rose 0.2 percent as the index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs increased notably. The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.2 percent in March after increasing 0.1 percent in February. Most of the major components increased in March, with the indexes for shelter and used cars and trucks accounting for about half the total increase for all items less food and energy. The indexes for medical care, apparel, recreation, new vehicles, and airline fares increased as well, while the indexes for tobacco and household furnishings and operations were among the few to decline in March." 


In other words, CPI looks o.k. if you don't count food and energy, the two things we use every single day. ES bumped up a bit on the report.


The overall decline in ES looks worse than it is at least from yesterday's close.


From the overnight highs, the decline looks fairly substantial, but ES closed at 4:00 p.m. yesterday at $1382.75 , so from the NY close, a loss of about 3.5 points. The market will gap a bit lower, but not horribly so. 


As usual, we'll be on the lookout for signs of the reversal to start moving in to short positions.



Thursday, April 12, 2012

Asia moving the market

Two events in Asia have moved ES, first the failure of the North Korean missile launch sent ES higher, shortly thereafter Chinese GDP misses big and sends ES lower.


Volatility, sentiment, etc...

There are a lot of ways to represent volatility, Bollinger bands aren't my favorite because the use the close, not the actual intraday volatility, so here's another way to represent volatility.

You may recall that my belief was this would be a very volatile bounce precisely because of increased volatility, which is something typically seen at tops, in fact optically it's pretty easy to eyeball.

This is a 10-day average of volatility, but not like BB's that measure the close. Note the two areas in the boxes, one the price candles are very small in their daily range, the second the price candles are 2-3X larger.

I have one member that reads all of the trading sites, as I don't typically have time for that he updates me periodically on what traders in general are thinking and most importantly, "Feeling". Here's his update for me today...

"Hi Brandt, It's working and the bulls looking to get back in and it's killed all
those who bought puts thinking plunge to 1350.  "
Here's some excerpts from Tuesday's market update 

 On a 60 min chart the top formation is much easier to see than a 1 day chart, so is the break. This is an important break. It has been our experience market wide that any break of important support almost always sees a strong volatility shakeout move. Technical traders will be expecting a test of former support, now resistance at the trendline. However our experience has been that rarely happens and the test will look like it failed as the market moves above resistance, this would keep the "Buy the dip" longs in the game as most people are pre-dispositioned to being long the market. With volatility increasing it would not surprise me to see a move above the trendline, it may take more then a day, but it wouldn't surprise me.


Think about the psychology of this, bulls feel like the top broke and the break was a failure, they feel safe to buy. The shorts ask themselves, "Why won't this market hold its losses? This must be a correction and not a top". This is exactly what Wall Street wants, to keep everyone guessing, to keep everyone moving in to trades as most traders chase the market and then see those same trades stopped out. This is all to Wall Street's advantage. So while I can't point to a strong enough positive divergence as of yet that would suggest such a move, that has been my experience. I have little doubt whatsoever we are witnessing a top breaking apart, however for the market to do what I mentioned above, volatility must increase. Over a week ago I said, "Watch out for increasing volatility".


The excerpts above were posted as the first hints of short term accumulation were forming for a bounce, later in the day they were clear. It kind of cracks me up that the talking heads attribute the move to the trade deficit, even though Initial Claims made the pre-market action look like today was going to be a flop. The truth is Wall Street works pretty far out in advance of price action. The dovish blabber from Yellen and Dudley probably did help today, but that switch back and forth every week and curiously it seems to be dovish when Wall Street has set up a bounce move like this in advance and hawkish when the move is failing and heading lower as we saw on Tuesday with the SPX breaking both the small H&S top trendline and the 50-day average-both important breaks as noted above.


Looking back at what has happened since Tuesday, the above excerpts from Tuesday's market update are right on track. Judging from sentiment on the blogs and financial sites, the move is having its intended effect. As I mentioned, there's no purpose in even bouncing the market if it isn't going to sway emotions, knock out shorts and give the bulls something to get excited about.


As for today's action, we saw pretty decent signs of distribution showing up in the negative divergences in the market averages as well as ES. We didn't see the same thing yesterday because there simply wasn't enough of a move to sell in to.


Some members have asked about the possibility of a pullback before the market moves higher, which as I mentioned in the last market update today, I think it will. A case can certainly be made for a pullback, but the point of such a bounce is to sway emotions and the stronger the bounce looks, the more effective it is in swaying emotions. 


I've mentioned it a few times and it makes sense to me, a rotation in to tech. The last bounce we saw before the SPX broke below the 50-day m.a., the SPX and Dow moved first while the NDX and Russell 2k were flat, the next day they switched. With the positive divergence in AAPL toward the end of the day, this theory makes even more sense. In light of that, we may see financial shorts set up before  Tech and I'll be on the lookout for that tomorrow.


Interestingly the dominant Price/Volume relationship among the averages' component stocks was solidly in the Price Up/Volume down camp, which is also the most bearish of the 4 price/volume relationships believe it or not.


The $AUD is just starting to diverge a bit from the SPX, this has been an excellent leading indicator, but for me, looking at the market at the end of the day and trying to decide where we are in the process, the divergence simply was not as sharp as it should be, I expect it will become more divergent. 


High Yield Corporate Credit looks supportive of the market's bounce, however upon closer inspection, HYG seems to simply be clearing out shorts as it has made a lower low (mentioned earlier in the week).  


High Yield Credit, which is very cheap vs the SPX did rally today, it would seem silly not to use HY Credit's cheapness in a bounce, however it is diverging compared to yesterday.


Yields have started to diverge today as well, another excellent leading indication and they've done so at the right spot, again, it wouldn't have made sense yesterday as the market was fighting some headwinds.


For the moment, there's not much to do but watch the market for signs of a reversal, that's where I want to back up the truck. The emotional damage that will come out of a failed move this volatile will be pretty heavy and being we've already broken the SPX's 50 day moving average with volatility as high as it is, the reversal back down should be uglier then the move up is impressive, but that's not a new concept, Fear is always stronger then Greed/Hope and that's why markets fall faster and harder then they rise.


If anything interesting develops before I go to bed, I'll make sure to post it.

GOOG Earnings...

Well I'm glad I didn't put out an earnings call on GOOG, either way.

The last time we had an earnings call on GOOG it was right on, but as mentioned, the signal didn't come until 15 minutes before the close. GOOG was running up like it did today at the end of day, but there was clear distribution in to the move up, that didn't happen today.

The last time we made an earnings call, price was going straight up, 3C was going straight down, that was an easy call.

However GOOG still has some longer term issues that were seen on the 60 min chart and they are obvious on the 1 day chart.

The earnings in GOOG were interesting and threw a few question marks in the mix.


For the headline numbers, “Adjusted” earnings came in at $10.08 per share, above consensus of $9.65. Net income was $2.89 billion, above last year’s $1.8 billion. On an adjusted basis, it was $3.33 billion, above consensus. Revenue was $10.65 billion, up 24% from a year ago.


Here's the potential monkey wrench...
The board gave the green light to a dividend proposal. Yo may recall AAPL recently did the same, it hasn't been trading so well since then. However the probably more relevant historical precedent can be found in MSFT.

This is what MSFT looked like BEFORE a dividend was announced...



And this is what MSFT's growth has looked like after a dividend was declared...

However the monkey wrench doesn't stop there, the dividend isn't what you'd normally associate with a dividend, it’s not a cash dividend, it’s a 2-for-1 stock split that’s going to result in the creation of a new class of non-voting stock. 


Straight from GOOG-


"Today we announced plans to create a new class of non-voting capital stock, which will be listed on NASDAQ. These shares will be distributed via a stock dividend to all existing stockholders: the owner of each existing share will receive one new share of the non-voting stock, giving investors twice the number of shares they had before. It’s effectively a two-for-one stock split—something many of our investors have long asked us for. These non-voting shares will be available for corporate uses, like equity-based employee compensation, that might otherwise dilute our governance structure."


What this means for GOOG going forward... We'll see. However for our purposes, GOOG is up in After hours. Perhaps this will cause a rotation to tech that I speculated about earlier?