Tuesday, November 16, 2010

You might find this interesting...

If this i so, financials may rally big time.

http://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/08/action-alert-is-pres-obamas-pocket-veto-on-h-r-3808-possibly-ineffective/

Please Read this.

7 comments:

Alesund said...

Sorry Brandt, I don't get it (I'm not American). Can you summarize in plain English what this means and when? Thanks!

JC said...

Fed buys $8.154 bln in bonds; Treasurys stay up 11/17 10:06 AM



NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- The Federal Reserve Bank of New York bought $8.154 billion in Treasury bonds on Wednesday, more then the U.S. central bank previously said it planned to buy during the operation. The buyback was the latest in almost-daily operations as the Fed engages in a second round of quantitative easing to support lending and spending. The amount includes purchases to be made under a previous program to reinvest cash from its maturing mortgage-related holdings back into Treasurys. Dealers offered to sell the Fed $29.905 billion. The Fed had said it would buy $7 billion to $8 billion in debt maturing from 2018 to 2020. After the announcement, the broader bond market held onto gains. Yields on 10-year notes , which move inversely to prices, fell 4 basis points to 2.81%.


Get more news on:SYMBOLS: .TNX, .TYX, TBT, TLT, SHYNEWS TYPE: BondsSECTORS: Commercial Banks, Insurance, Capital Markets, Financials

Brandt said...

Alesund, it basically is a little known about "possible loophole" in which the president "pocket vetoed" legislation passed by Congress that would make it much easier for the banks to not face consequences for the robo-signing scandal that is brewing over foreclosures-the false signatures attesting knowledge about a properties deed, when they did not have such knowledge. It could be a way for Obama to look like he is standing up for the law for American Citizens BEFORE the election , but after the election has passed, there's a possibility it could become law because he did not use a straight veto. In essence an election time trick to give the banks a back door escape to many of the legal problems they face over Robo-signing regarding foreclosures.

JC said...

Brandt, can we get a market update as soon as possible. It would seem like we have be in a pattern that would indicate accumulation. Can you validate with 3C? Thanks

Brandt said...

Just updated Jack

JC said...

Thanks Brandt, seems to be all over the place

Brandt said...

My thoughts exactly Jack, but there is a bias there to the upside thus far. I'm surprised we are not higher.