Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Correlation Between the SPY and SMH

Well that SMH pattern broke down, just to show you that SMH is being used today to move the market, look at the correlation, SPY in green, SMH in red

15 comments:

Mr Pink said...

How does 3C think the markets will close Brandt? Looks like we are going up to the highs of the day again.

john9o9 said...

sure looks like it

Mr Pink said...

Yep, looks look the sell off at the close yesterday has been all recovered nicely. And just think, the DOW was actually down 80 points at one point today.

There is not a retail investor in sight in these markets, we need to stop kidding ourselves that these games are to trap retail investors in at higher prices. This market just the consists of the FED, hedge funds and HFT who take the market wherever they want, usually up!

john9o9 said...

absolutely, the bots and the fed are the other side of the trade. gotta think the boyz are showing their allegiance to the current administration here too.

Quality Stocks said...

Mr. Pink your statements are very emotional and cloud the picture what is going on. You should try to always trade in an unemotional manner or else you will make rash decisions that are not productive.

Brandt said...

Mr. Pink, I don't really know how to make it more clear that 3C is not a timing tool, it simply is telling you what is happening into rising or falling prices. Anything beyond that as to "how will we close is just my guess". Right now 3C is in a negative position but following price, meaning there's no positive divergence, the negative position remains. If I knew when I would be sitting on a 150 foot yacht in the Virgin Islands right now. That being said, all are in relative negative divergences right now.

Brandt said...

Also SMH is negative as well in every timeframe so I'd expect it won't be up here much longer.

john9o9 said...

close on the highs wouldn't surprise me to see gap over that 1150 rez in the am, that's usually what happens.

john9o9 said...

negative divergance in any other indicator i follow isn't a sell signal and can go on for a long time!

john9o9 said...

140 point swing so much for negative divergence!!!

Mr Pink said...

Hi Brandt,

Don't feel i'm having a go at you. I'm certainly not.

When i said 'how do you think the market will close'... i mean, what's the highest probability given the signs that 3C and other indicators are showing.

Obviously no indicator can give 100% correct predications, otherwise i'd have a yacht in same harbour as you in the Virgin Islands. I'm just looking for the highest probability!

Mr Pink said...

Note: There's a few things happening after hours today:

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/todays-economic-data-highlights-7

Brandt said...

This is one of the strangest situations I've seen, stranger then Q1 2009 with a lot of manipulation. However, even with manipulation, 3C made the call correctly. The Fed is not transparent at all about what they are doing, believe me, if they wanted this market significantly higher, they had about a half dozen good chances, why there's still distribution into higher prices and insiders flocking out of the market in the face of POMO, I don't know. I suspect there's a lot more to the story. I'll update the 3C charts tonight.

Brandt said...

John 3C is not like any other indicator you've probably seen. A negative divergence is when the indicator is showing distribution into rising prices. To answer when the turn occurs, you have to know how much inventory is being distributed a day and how much left there is and if they intend on then accumulating a short position which would still be a negative divergence. Smart money doesn't buy into trends, they create them. they bought in (in this case) a week before it started as the market was still falling, it's all documented here.

Mr Pink said...

... but we did establish the other night that they didn't accumulate much before the 'bounce', correct Brandt?